Piecemeal Revelation

Sharing Options

“At thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore” (Ps. 16: 11)

The Basket Case Chronicles #160

When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known. And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity” (1 Cor. 13:11–13).

In the previous verses, we were considering whether knowing in part or prophesying in part referred to the time of the older covenant or to the time prior to the eschaton. Is the arrival of the “perfect” to be understood as the completion of the canon, or as the resurrection of the dead. We now come to the place where I come down on the question—albeit gingerly.

When images are used in Scripture, one of our first questions should concern how that image is used in other places of Scriptures—and not what associations with that image might arise in our minds, for whatever reason.

The time prior to the “perfect” is described as the time of speaking and understanding in childish ways. This is not an image the Bible uses for our mortal lives, but it an image used for the time of God’s children under the old covenant. “Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster” (Gal. 3:24–25).

And Paul describes the process of “becoming a man” as one, which if it is not quite completed, is at least started. When I became a man . . . While “face to face” has an eschatological feel to it, the whole idea of knowing in part appears to apply to the time of the old covenant, as contrasted with the fullness of knowledge in the time of the New Testament.

“Of which salvation the prophets have inquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow. Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into” (1 Pet. 1:10–12).

The knowledge of the older covenant was certainly a piecemeal affair, but when the Scriptures speak of the coming of the Christ, the note of completion is struck. “God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds” (Heb. 1:1–2).

Taking all this together, I take “the perfect” as God’s gift of the canon of Scripture, and all that this gift entails throughout all of church history, up to the culmination of all things. But this will require further explanation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
timothy
timothy
10 years ago

Very interesting. Thanks.

t

Andrew Lohr
10 years ago

Canon? Neither I Cor nor the rest of the NT looks in a clear way for a completed canon, and if it did, when was it completed for practical use? Athanasius’s list of NT books after AD 300, the first known list identical to what we all use? The reformation, after AD 1500, which firmly excluded the apocrypha? Was that what I Cor 13 promised? I agree the NT was written before AD 70, but for all known Christians on earth the canon remained a bit fuzzy until much later. And isn’t the focus on Christ, not on the canon?… Read more »

Brad
Brad
10 years ago

“For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face.” What/when does the word “then” refer to? And what does it mean by “face to face”? In what sense is the New Testament canon seeing “face to face”?

A Wheelr
10 years ago

Just when I thought my question in the previous post about this was getting ignored, you start tapping on the answer. Looking forward to the next post that I’m sure will unpack this even more. Thanks!

Eric Stampher
Eric Stampher
10 years ago

“When images are used in Scripture, one of our first questions should concern how that image is used in other places of Scriptures” — yes please!

Bible “put away” = frequently used term, with near universal disapprobation. Therefore it informs “childish”, which appears nowhere else I can find, though you equate it to school kids.

Bottom line, Scripture says to get rid of this, and it was never acceptable or useful, unlike the old covenant, which was never childish.

Eric Stampher
Eric Stampher
10 years ago

But anyway … you have Paul in this set of verses stepping back to and speaking from what you’re saying is the Old Testament childish & uninformed perspective: “For now (meaning: back then, speaking as OT folks) we see (saw really, since we can now see pretty near completely clearly) darkly, childishly … but THEN (meaning: now, or at least soon, when the canon gets wrapped up, which is mostly dependent on me getting the rest of these letters done, and maybe John if he ever gets that tome done that he’s been hankering on about) “. So now that… Read more »