Letters for the Edification of All

Sharing Options
Show Outline with Links

On Romance Novels

You published a letter from a man who objected to his wife reading romance novels. Your response was for him to talk to her, with the implication that he should scold her because her novels were the same as porn.
I think you didn’t provide enough information and guidance. The category ‘romance novel’ encompasses everything from Jane Austen through Georgette Heyer to stuff that really is bad. (And a lot of it is bad regardless of the plot or descriptions. Judith Krantz wrote explicit sex scenes using truly horrendous prose. Take out every sex scene and the books are still garbage.) Still, judging romance novels requires a lot more discernment than judging porn does, especially since plenty of other genres of literature contain elements to avoid. The James Bond spy novels usually have some explicit sex as well as violence and other sins. You know literature well enough to understand this point and I wish you had made it more explicitly.

Karen

Karen, the reason I did not make that point more explicit is because he did. He did not write with a concern about romance novels in general, but rather because his wife was reading raunchy ones. I certainly don’t equate romance novels with porn, and neither did he. And the idea of “scolding” was way far from my mind. When I wrote talk, I meant talk.

Wrong Answers Red Penned

Didn’t some of the reformers advocate some form of public charity / civil care of the poor (although it would have been on a local rather than national level)? Obviously the contemporary welfare state is in practice a disaster, but would these reformers have objected to it in principle?

John

John, yes. But because the line between church and state was blurrier, so was the line between tithes and taxes. I like a sharper distinction (not a divorce) between them, and would prefer that local municipal indigent funds be supplied from tithes.
Reference your article “The Grace of Wrong Answers,” you noted that a 10% tax is your threshold because that’s what God required in the OT. But in addition wasn’t there a temple tax (Exodus 30:13–16) and festival tithe/tax Deuteronomy 14:22-29? Appears to me there’s slightly over 20%. Thank you for your ministry!

Tyler

Tyler, yes, you are correct. My understanding is that all of the tithes added together came to ten percent. But someone like Rushdoony, for example, taught that they were distinct, and because one of them came every third year, the total would be around 23.3%.
Re “The Grace of wrong answers’: sinners don’t just want “maneuvering room” when God lays down the Law; they want to be in charge. They want to be the ones in charge. In pride they think themselves fit to be the ones in charge, rather than God. (I see—or can easily suspect—way too much of this in me in some ways.) Not just “room,” but pride and ruling power.
In contrast to take-charge pride, “Transformation in Christ,” book by conservative Roman Catholic Dietrich von Hildebrand, calls for ‘unlimited readiness to be transformed in Christ’ and has about 18 chapters on aspects of transformation.

Andrew

Andrew, thanks.

Just War and Abortion

I’ve been pondering just war theory lately. My question has to do with abortion: Given that abortion is easily one of the greatest evils in human history, it seems to me that a war would be entirely justified on that basis. Separate but related question: is vigilante justice ever warranted? How should we view people who e.g. bomb abortion mills or assassinate abortionists? I seem to recall you mentioning someone who did something like that in a recent article, with some disdain.

Abo Litionist

A.L. yes, I believe that a war to end abortion could easily meet the criteria of just war theory, depending. Vigilantes are another matter. They generally make a mess, and set back the cause they are ostensibly fighting for.

Pronomian?

Could you please consider looking into pronomian Christianity? It is a theological system with many differences from yours, but I believe that you might find its similarities to yours a bit interesting. The best writings from this movement in my current opinion are “The Role of the Law in the Sanctification of the Believer Today: A Brief Introduction to Pronomianism” by Dr. Benjamin Szumskyj and the Pronomian Pocket Guide book series. Just some ideas for a little extra reading. Keep up the great work, sir, and may the Lord continue blessing you and keeping you.
A daily reader,

Samuel

Samuel, thanks for the recommendation. Anybody else know about this?

Anabaptism

I’m a fairly recent convert to Calvinism from old order Amish, so my heritage is anabaptist. I am wondering if Doug has ever read Martyrs mirror . . . he seems to have a low view of anabaptists . . . I would love to have a conversation about this . . . thank you!

Allen

Allen, sorry, no, I have not read that book. And my view of anabaptists is that some of them were saintly and others were weirdos. And of course I differ with anabaptist theology.

A Glitch in the System?

I wrote about this problem a few weeks ago but it persists. It appears some of your links violate some sort of “community standards” and google deletes them.

Howard

Howard, thank you. Can you give me an example so I can go check it? And has anybody else noticed this?

Begin With Gratitude

What do we make of God using so many of the less than perfect people and churches? E.G.s: If cessationism is true, then why does God seem to continue to work through Pentecostal churches? If women should not be pastors, why does he seem to continue to work in and through churches with them? And on the cessationist question—what are people doing who continue to speak in tongues? Are they deceived? Lying? Inappropriately using a legitimate gift? I’ve recently “converted” to Presbyterianism out of a Baptist history, but also have a lot of non-denom and charismatic brothers and sisters I interact with. Co-existing is proving problematic. The “perfectionism” that Reformed folks tend toward is something from which I am not immune. Trying to keep that in check. These questions about God using what some Reformed folks call “abominations” (women pastors, etc) linger. Sorting out how to both think about them and interact with them will be helpful. Thank you.

Bryan

Bryan, we should first begin with deep gratitude for the fact that God continues to use less. than perfect instruments, right? If He didn’t, no one would be useful. I believe that certain traditions contain more of the truth, but I do not believe that any tradition has in any sense arrived. But if I believe that God is absolutely sovereign, I believe that He can draw straight with crooked lines. I cannot do so, so my role is to be as obedient to the Word as I know how to be, while letting God work marvels elsewhere as He pleases.

Preaching on the Ten Commandments?

This is not in response to any post in particular. Rather, I’m a young small-church Pastor and I’m considering preaching a series on the Ten Commandments. I was just wondering if you had any book recommendations on the topic?
Thanks,

Bryan

Bryan, my book on it is called Fire on the Mountain, see below. And Thomas Watson has a book on the Decalogue, and Watson is always good. And C.S. Lewis’s wife, Joy Davidman, wrote an interesting book on the Ten Commandments entitled Smoke on the Mountain.

Sunday Morning and Evening

I’ve been researching the biblical basis for churches having morning and evening services to properly observe the Sabbath and so far, the only passage that supports the position is Psalm 92. I know Christ Church and its affliliate churches don’t have morning and evening Sunday services. How do you exegete Psalm 92’s mention of David’s worship of God in the morning and evening while being accompanied by instruments (this seems to imply two gatherings per Sabbath)? Does this passage dictate that morning and evening services are part of the regulative principle of worship? Thank you.
Sincerely,

Brent

Brent, first, I have no objection to the practice for those churches that are accustomed to it, and who find it edifying. God bless them all. But I don’t think it is mandated, and Psalm 92 is not sufficient to establish it as a requirement. That stand I believe proves too much. The KJV and NKJV both have this: “To declare Your lovingkindness in the morning, and Your faithfulness every night” (Psalm 92:2). The text taken that way proves too much.

Sunday Morning Specials

What are your thoughts on church members singing “specials” during the worship service? Could something like this fall under Paul’s category of “spiritual songs”? If this is something you don’t believe is wise, how would you approach congregants that feel strongly about using their gift to worship during the main service?

Ben

Ben, you are right. I don’t believe it is wise. The closest I would get would be when there is a solo part in a choral piece. But even there I think we have to work to keep “performances” and “entertainment” out of our worship. So I would encourage such individuals to join the choir. If they don’t want to use their gift that way because there is no spotlight then we have located the cause of my concern.

Upcoming Election in Canada

There’s an election coming up here in Canada for Federal Parliament. It’s scheduled for Monday, April 28th. While most of the parties, as you and others have described, are simply heading toward the cliff at different speeds, one party stands out that wants to drive away from the cliff, and call our country back to Jesus Christ:
The Christian Heritage Party of Canada!
A few months ago, Andrew DeBartolo from Liberty Coalition Canada gave a brief plug for it on CrossPolitic. Allow me to give another short one. It’s Canada’s only 100% pro-life party, its policies and vision are informed by Reformed theology, it has partnered with Liberty Coalition and Ezra Institute, and its members trust in the power of the Holy Spirit for revival both among the people and in the government.
It’s a small party in human terms, but its members serve a mighty God who can lay waste all His foes. There are about 30 or 35 candidates running for seats in Parliament for the CHP. Please pray that God would be kind to grant a few of those candidates a win, and at the very least, that they all would be granted opportunity to proclaim the law, the Gospel, and the rule and reign of our King, Jesus Christ!
You can find more information about the party here (chp.ca) and the candidates here (chp.ca/candidates).
God bless you!

Chris

Chris, thanks for the information.

A Promise in Isaiah

What do you think this verse means?
Isa 65:20 “No more shall there be in it an infant who lives but a few days, or an old man who does not fill out his days, for the young man shall die a hundred years old, and the sinner a hundred years old shall be accursed.”
Does this mean that the human life span prior to the return of Christ will be much greater than they are now? Or is this some kind of allegory?

JC

JC, I believe that as the world is being restored through the gospel, life spans will greatly increase.

One Book Leads to Another

Not commenting on any particular post. Rather this is a question on your book Reforming Marriage. You mentioned that husbands are to love their wives as Christ loved the church. But what does that even look like for a husband to act that out in his marriage? Could you provide some real life examples of this?

VK

VK, I am afraid it is an all-day-every-day kind of thing. The best way to answer it would be to point to another book, My Life for Yours, which is a walk through every room of the house.

The Problem of TMI

I hope you are doing well. I’m currently in the season of life where lots of my friends and family are either getting married or pregnant! I’m already married and have children, so this isn’t a singleness question, nor am I new to the world of “marriage relations.” My question more deals with the people around me who are relatively newer to THAT world, or they have been familiar with that realm for quite a while. While growing up, my parents had always informed me that those kinds of conversations were best discussed in private with somebody when you needed help, such as a pastor or with a godly older man or woman, and even with your husband or wife later on. You could include a doctor, if needed, and of course one ought to pray in case you have any questions or issues.
Something that’s come to my attention in the last few years is how unbelievably open many in my generation are regarding those things. This includes certain of my friends informing me as to things they and their husbands do in that realm, certain tools they use, or even giving unsolicited advice by using their husbands as examples. It’s very bizarre, and certainly somewhat inappropriate. I’m not prudish, I just think that there ought to be a proper respect one shows one’s husband or wife when they’re not in the room.
It’s happened enough times where it bothers me, but I just have no idea how to inform somebody that in the moment. I want to be discerning, and not come across as “Victorianly prudish.” I just think there’s a line some people cross when they inform me of their relations with their spouse, and I think their spouse deserves more respect than that.

ON

ON, I agree completely. Unfortunately, if you want it to stop you will have to say something about it sometime. You might find it helpful to open the subject with them by asking questions about it, instead of starting with the Big Rebuke. The questions can clearly communicate the fact that you believe that there is impropriety involved, or possibly involved, but without you coming across as a censorious or uptight lady. “Does your husband talk about you with the boys this way?” And all that should lead naturally to you being able to say that you would rather not be a participant in conversations like that.

Another Argument for Head Coverings

There is one pragmatic argument for head coverings that I keep coming back to—it would be very hard for women to teach / preach / assume authority over a man if they wore head coverings. It’s almost as if they inoculate against such practices, regardless of whether Scripture strictly requires them.
Given the prevalence of feminism inside and outside the church, I do wonder whether a visible sign of a woman’s submission might be prudent these days as a both reminder to the faithful and a sign to the unbeliever
Is there any merit to this instinct in your view?

Tom

Tom, I agree that if the women agreed to wear head coverings, they would be much less likely to want to preach. But all the women who want to preach would you fight you tooth and nail at that first rampant, and they would likely have better success there than they do with the texts that prohibit them from preaching and teaching.

Ambition and Wealth

Do you have a simple litmus test for generally determining whether or not the pursuit of financial gain is ambitious in a good and godly way versus a greedy or envious one?
For a little more detail, is it ever okay to compare my work with someone else’s work and then try to negotiate higher pay from my employer if I know others are being paid more than me for the same work? Is that envy and greed? Or a form of shrewdness?

Joshua

Joshua, a good book for calibrating your heart would be Rescuing Ambition by Dave Harvey. And I think that comparisons to other individuals is perilous. That said, if you are going good work, there is no problem asking for a raise. But I would stay far away from the sidelong glance. Comparisons are usually odious.

Recovering from Porn

Thank you for all the work you do. I’ve really benefited greatly from your teaching.
My question has to do with forgiveness, healing, and rebuilding trust. I made some very poor decisions in the past and sinned against my wife by looking at pornography. My sin caused her great pain and understandably damaged trust between us. I have repented of all that. It’s been many years since I looked at pornography and by the grace of God I am a changed man in that department.
She says she has forgiven me, but also says she is still healing and that bringing up the topic in order to “talk about it” will help her heal emotionally. This feels to me like “keeping a record of wrongs” on her part and I confess it agitates me greatly since I stopped looking at porn years ago. Am I looking at this incorrectly? You have taught that forgiveness is not the same as trust, and I am in agreement with you. I know I need to earn her trust back. I guess my question really has to do with my responsibility toward my wife with regard to “emotional healing?” Am I responsible for that? Or is that the Holy Spirit’s work? Am I making the problem worse by continuing to try and “talk about it?”

J

J, if it has been years, then I can assure you that “talking about it” is not going to help her to heal at all. In the immediate aftermath of a blow-up, there are things to work through, obviously, and it would be necessary to talk through the issues. But that would be like cleaning and dressing a wound. Later on, picking at a scab is counterproductive. And even later than that, picking at a scar represents a new and different problem.

Polygamy Question

Can you help me to understand the seemingly inconsistent treatment of polygamy in the Old Testament? For example, Joash is a good king of Judah, as long as he follows Jehoida’s leadership. But also, Jehoida “took two wives for him (Joash).” On the surface, that seems like a tacit endorsement of the practice.

Bill

Bill, true, the Old Testament contains tacit acceptance of polygamy, which is not the same thing as endorsement. If you are interested, I have a chapter on this in my book Fidelity. We know that monogamy is the standard for Christian marriage from the creation order (Adam and Eve, not Adam and Eve and Suzy and Sally), from the fact that Christ has only one bride, the Church, and from the fact that Christian leaders, set up as examples for all Christians (Heb. 13:7, 17) are required to be monogamists (1 Tim. 3:2).

Women’s Ministries

I have a couple questions in regard to your recent videos on women’s ministries. I agree with you that many face-to-face women’s are problematic and the issue of accidentally making a women’s pastor is almost inevitable with Big Eva’s standard model. But practically speaking . . .
If face-to-face women’s Bible studies are not something to be pursued and should instead focus outward, are men’s ministries handled the same way?
What are your thoughts on one-on-one women’s ministry in a mentor/discipleship type model? Does that fall into the same category?
If I understand correctly—if not, please correct me, the main resource for a woman’s theology should be the Lord’s Day service and her husband. What resources are provided for single women if women are generally discouraged from teaching theology in the church?
Do you think that teaching/exposition of Scripture should be generally limited to the Lord’s Day service? Then the rest of the week is focused on the good works we are called to?
I am excited to consider healthier and more productive ways to encourage women in the church. Thank you for sharing these videos!

Raven

Raven, the issue is not one of lawful/unlawful, but rather a question of emphasis. I believe the main teaching of the church should be on the Lord’s Day, for both men and women. There is no problem with the occasional Bible or book study here and there, for men and women both. And we encourage men and women both to be avid Bible readers (e.g. the Bible Reading Challenge). But with all that as the baseline, the thing we want to emphasize is love and good works.

Motivations?

Thank you for your ministry! I’m a 25-year-old Reformed Baptist, and our first daughter is about to turn 1. We’ve been tremendously blessed by all the resources on Canon+, especially as first-generation Christians on both sides of our family.
How would you counsel men who feel discouraged (rather than inspired) by the success & achievements of other men? Recently I have found myself in this position—I feel genuinely happy for my brothers in Christ who are very successful (not merely financially, but in various aspects of life), and I’m grateful for Christian men in history who have accomplished great feats, but for some reason I also feel a sense of discouragement. As far as I can tell this isn’t a case of jealousy/covetousness, but maybe it is? I’m having difficulty discerning why I might be feeling this way or what sin I may be falling prey to, so I’m curious what thoughts you have here.
God bless

Theodore

Theodore, it does sound like it might be envy, but there are other possibilities also. One is simply that you have gotten into the habit of thinking that you are called to do what somebody else was called to do, and then you feel like you failed when it doesn’t happen. The problem there would be the adoption of a false standard. What are your gifts and graces? And where in the church is there a need that matches?

Mandatory Marriage?

I’ve just recently discovered your work. I really appreciated your YT video “Calvinism and Girls.” I also watched another clip on your YT channel about the difference between singleness and celibacy; “while celibacy is a gift, singleness is just a state of being.”
I greatly appreciate your insights, yours and the gentleman you were with. My initial question is, if marriage is providential, is that to say that it is mandatory? If it is not mandatory, how do you suggest that single Christians like myself with no interest in marriage, sexual relations or children reconcile our lack of desire with your assertions?
Over the last 5-6 years, I have been on a journey of growth and personal development before the LORD, which unfortunately has been marred by a pornography addiction. I am still a virgin, and while I hope, pray and truly believe that victory lies ahead, is this really a telltale sign that I simply cannot hope to have or even attain the gift of celibacy? Are you sure that this couldn’t simply apply to people who think they can use porn as a therapeutic measure, a coping mechanism or even as sex education? I assure you, I do not subscribe to this mode of thinking at all.
Lastly, I would like to reference Paul as you did. Evidence suggests that he was married before he became a Christian. Clearly, he attained the gift of celibacy later in his life, arguably due to his faith in Christ. Could this not be said to be evidence that celibacy can be worked for, or at least provided if fervently prayed for?
Thanks for accepting letters! My brother in Christ, I live in Canada, so we may never meet in this life, but thank-you for doing the work of the LORD. I would never have thought twice about “the gift of singleness” and again, your insights are greatly appreciated. It helps to have a well-rounded view of all of the opinions and interpretations on this subject. We will meet in eternity!

Izzie

Izzie, everything hinges on why and how you have “no interest” in marriage, sexual relations, or children. If sexual temptation is still present, then that would not be the gift of celibacy. If you still have sexual interest, but no interest in an actual relationship, then that would be a kink in your singleness, and would be unlikely to grow up into the gift of celibacy. I would not say that marriage for someone in your position is mandatory, but I think you should possibly start thinking about it as “to be desired.” I would encourage you to start praying about it.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
17 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael
Michael
8 hours ago

In response to Bryan on the ten commandments:

For a more general treatment, also check out Greg Bahnsen’s “By This Standard”.

E
E
7 hours ago

Polygamy question:
I agree that this is something to discuss and seems to be more than just simple acceptance of polygamy…there are multiple OT people, including David, with more than one wife. But it also raises another question. What about incest? If Adam and Eve were the first people, it leads to the fact that their children would have married each other and procreated. How does one respond to this? How do we rationalize or justify it accordingly?

Ken
Ken
6 hours ago
Reply to  E

Regarding the second generation of mankind (or, for that matter, the immediate generations following the Flood): What was their alternative? I look on it as a special circumstance, the necessity of which disappeared with time and the further propagation of the species.

E
E
6 hours ago
Reply to  Ken

OK, but that doesn’t answer my question at all. Anything can be a special circumstance…it’s probably more true, and humble, to say that we just don’t know or understand. My main problem is this fastidious understanding of scripture…until something can’t be explained. Incest was OK then, but it became “not OK” at some seemingly random or arbitrary point. Just like polygamy…and many other things. I think more grace and humility are needed…

Ken
Ken
6 hours ago
Reply to  E

“This fastidious understanding of Scripture…until something can’t be explained.” I attempted an explanation, but evidently it didn’t pass muster. The simple fact is that in order to obey the creation mandate to “be fruitful and multiply,” the children of Adam and Eve had limited options. The next generation were entirely brothers and sisters. We are in agreement on that, presumably. Do you think God wasn’t aware of it? If he considered it sinful then, what would have been the circumstance if the fall hadn’t occurred and righteous man and wife had been fruitful? Would the matter of marriage and procreation… Read more »

E
E
5 hours ago
Reply to  Ken

Your explanation was that it’s a special circumstance, which isn’t really much of an explanation. I agree that options were limited, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t an issue or problem with it. I do believe there is something inherently wrong with sibling relationships and that it’s not just “sin” that corrupted it. I’m saying that this is not a black and white issue…we don’t understand Gods ways, but shouldn’t we allow for that nuance? We can say, “well, polygamy and incest were OK in the OT, but that changed (for some unknown, God-ordained reason).” It seems very mic pick… Read more »

Justin Parris
Justin Parris
3 hours ago
Reply to  E

“ I do believe there is something inherently wrong with sibling relationships” Then in order to answer this question to your satisfaction we need to understand the nature of this belief. Is it divine edict? Your personal feelings? A logical entailment of another moral law? Understand I’m not arguing the opposite. I am not saying there is nothing wrong with incest. I’m just saying if what you’re asking for is an answer you find personally satisfying, well we won’t know how to do that until we find out what it is we’re trying to satisfy. “Your explanation was that it’s a… Read more »

Jane
Jane
6 hours ago
Reply to  E

Anything can be claimed to be a special circumstance, but nothing can be a special circumstance comparable to being the only people in existence and God ordaining that the earth should be filled with humans.

E
E
5 hours ago
Reply to  Jane

That’s still just a claim you’re making…

Justin Parris
Justin Parris
3 hours ago
Reply to  E

This is a response you get to use *after* you establish Adam and Eve did anything wrong. You didn’t. Jane’s claim is no more claim-y than your claim. Find where what they did broke a moral law, show us the text of that law, and only then can you play the condescension game about lack of evidence in a response.

E
E
2 hours ago
Reply to  Justin Parris

Good rules, except I didn’t claim anything…unless you’d like to elaborate. I never said they broke a moral law; I simply asked a question…not making a claim without evidence. Can you answer then: why was incest and polygamy OK then and not now?

The Commenter Formerly Known As fp
The Commenter Formerly Known As fp
1 hour ago
Reply to  E

Justin did answer: “The individual moral laws are all true, but when one comes into conflict with another the priority system snaps them into their appropriate places.”

Ball’s in your court, kiddo. Best way to move the game forward is to respond to this answer.

E
E
1 hour ago

When did he say that? Doesn’t look like an actual quote. What is the priority system?

The Commenter Formerly Known As fp
The Commenter Formerly Known As fp
1 hour ago
Reply to  E

Tuesday, April 15, 2025 at 5:31pm. Scroll up.

E
E
1 hour ago

It’s all about interpretation…that’s my point. It appears to be a claim of truth; I’m saying that it’s up to each individuals perspective and interpretation…

The Commenter Formerly Known As fp
The Commenter Formerly Known As fp
57 minutes ago
Reply to  E

So you’re here to stir excrement, not engage in constructive dialogue. Got it.

Dave
Dave
2 minutes ago

A quick Googling of the “Pronomian” movement shows it appears to be the latest variation of Hebrew Roots / Sacred Name / Messianic Judaism / Armstrongism, and the like. From pronomian dot com: Within its modern use, Pronomian has come to mean Christians that believe the law of God is not only good, but is one of God’s ways of sanctifying believers. Because of this belief, those who hold to pronomian theology are often termed “torah observant” and celebrate things like the Sabbath, Biblical Festivals, and the biblical dietary laws.  For the Church’s historical response to such teachings, I suggest… Read more »