I very much appreciate your descriptions and metaphors of the different categories of evangelicals. But I’m more thankful for your clear vision and your courage to step onto the battlefield. I have some sense of the pressure you must be under. Would that more of us gird up. Warren Zevon sang,
“Don’t you feel like desperadoes under the eaves, heaven help the one who leaves”
I’m praying for you and your comrades in Moscow and that more of us would leave the eaves.
Jason, thanks for the kind words. And, as Warren also sang so memorably, “Send lawyers, guns, and money.”
A beautiful soliloquy, Dear John letter, and eulogy all in one. Buckley would have enjoyed it. Maybe even written it.
Referencing your article about leaving NR:
Where I’m from (Tennessee), Cracker Barrel restaurants don’t have booths, only tables.
Do Cracker Barrel restaurants in Idaho have booths or were you speaking metaphorically about people who frequent cornpone eateries?
Cracker Barrel actually IS a cornpone eatery, of course.
(My husband and I love your work, by the way.)
Carole, see? I can’t get away with anything.
Reading a book I bought as a result of an American Thinker piece I read- The Power of the Powerless, by Vaclav Havel (the Czech dissident before the Soviet collapse and later President of the Czech Republic). Not sure whether he had an overt commitment to our Lord, but the principles he espouses for living in and even overthrowing a post-totalitarian system (not “post-“ in the sense it’s no longer totalitarian, but in the sense it’s self-perpetuating without a dictator; i.e. the citizens themselves are both victims & oppressors in that system) sure seem compatible to my understanding of our country and our duties to it as Christian citizens. (Cliffnotes: The Power of the Powerless is to live within the truth in a society that is living within lies) 1) Are you familiar with this work?
I give you the money quote which prompts my second question-
“Since all genuine problems and matters of critical importance are hidden beneath a thick crust of lies, it is never quite clear when the proverbial last straw will fall, or what the straw will be. THIS, TOO, IS WHY THE REGIME PROSECUTES, ALMOST AS A REFLEX ACTION PREVENTIVELY, EVEN THE MOST MODEST ATTEMPTS TO LIVE WITHIN THE TRUTH.”
And so, question #2 is- What the latest on Stickergate and your dissident progeny?
Steve, thanks for the reference. I ordered it. As for Keystone Koppery of Stickergate, the next thing up is a jury trial in a few months.
Thank you for introducing me to P.G Wodehouse. I am devouring an Overlook Press copy of “Carry On Jeeves” , as recommended by Stephen Fry for folks new to Wodehouse. As he puts it, “if your Wodehouse journey begins now, you are the luckiest person in the world”.
After going over your Goodreads account, in your whopping 88 Wodehouse titles you have read, you gave a perfect 5 stars to “Cocktail Time” and “The Code of The Woosters”. Which Wodehouse book should I pick up next?
Gary, I would go with Leave it to Psmith.
I have been following your Dear Dawson series and have been challenged by it, and learned a lot from it. Yet there is one question that I have had that brings me back to this paragraph from Lack of Communication is Key:
“They are constantly exhorted to “show, don’t tell.” There is no way to keep your dinner conversation on that first date from being a time of self-disclosure. Her interactions with you will tell her many thing many things about you. But if you approach it wisely they will tell her these things obliquely, and they will leave her with the sense that there is much that you are holding back.”
I have been struggling to find practical ways of how to not over share on a date but to have interactions that will tell her about me. Any advise in this area would be greatly appreciated.
Noah, to keep it as simple and straightforward as possible, talk about things that interest you, but don’t talk about how those things that interest you make you feel. But don’t make the opposite mistake (if what interests you is astrophysics) of going down a wormhole.
Are your “Dear Dawson” letters going to be made into a physical book, perchance? Can I at least hope? I’d be the first to jump in line to buy it.
Annie, the answer to that one is yes. I have turned the manuscript into Canon Press already.
I’ve been listening to Nancy Wilson’s “Women & Marriage” series on myCanonPlus. In the talk on “Keeping Short Accounts” she mentions not being in front of others when you are out of fellowship with your spouse. I have heard this being taught by Doug Wilson and Toby Sumpter as well. Nancy said something like, if you have a class or job to go to, quickly get back into fellowship by asking forgiveness and granting forgiveness. It doesn’t have to take that long to humble yourself and get back into fellowship. She says that you can work out the details later. You can discuss the situation later (not at 10pm or not when high emotions are there). She also says to not bring up something that forgiveness has previously been granted for. I would like some clarification on this teaching. If you can quickly get back into fellowship by asking forgiveness, and then you are not supposed to bring up something that forgiveness has been granted for, how is it ok to “work out the details later”? It would seem that during “later” when there is more time to discuss it would be inevitable that you would discuss something for which forgiveness had been granted in the quick “get back in fellowship”.
Also, given the premise of “don’t ask forgiveness for something unless God thinks you should,” you would not want to offer a fake “please forgive me” in order just for things to be quickly put to “rights”. This is where we get stuck a lot. Neither of us sees what we need to ask forgiveness for. That makes it difficult to get back into fellowship quickly. We ask God to show us, but it is often not until the “discussion” part between us, which takes some time, that either of us see the sin and then ask forgiveness. If the sin is not seen, yet it is 12am and work looms tomorrow, what do you suggest?
Wendy, what this means is that if you had a bump because the checkbook wasn’t balanced, you don’t need to go down to the bank in order to get back into fellowship. You can balance the checkbook later. What you are confessing are the attitudes that put you out with the other person, and those are almost always right there, right on the surface. And you are right—you can’t make a sincere confession if you don’t know what it is. But as soon as you know, confession should be immediate.
A Woman as Magistrate
Greetings from the UK. I have my husband’s permission to seek your wise counsel on a question regarding the magistracy.
In our household, my husband is the breadwinner and I am the homemaker. The Lord has thus far chosen not to bless us with children. We decided that I would make a good candidate for the (voluntary) role of civil magistrate. However, I was stopped in my tracks when I read in one of your recent newsletters a quote from Gashmu Saith It:
“The family is the ministry of health, education and welfare. The Church is the ministry of grace and peace. The civil magistrate is the ministry of justice. But the (non-institutional) government that supports and makes possible all three of these is self-government.”
Following the example of Deborah (Judges 4:1-5:31), I had always thought it permissible for Christian women hold the office of judge/magistrate. Having looked again at what the Bible says about rulers and governors (Isaiah 3:12; Proverbs 31:23), it struck me that the role of arbiter of justice is perhaps a uniquely masculine calling, and the civil magistracy is not a sphere in which a woman should hold authority.
Does a female magistrate undermine the Biblical doctrine of the headship of man (1 Corinthians 11:3)? Should I abandon my plans to apply for this position?
Thank you for your work for the kingdom. Your ministry has been such a blessing to us, in countless ways!
Lucie, thank you for the question. My take on that one is that for a woman to be a magistrate is lawful, given the example of Deborah, but that it should not be routine and ordinary, given the other passages and principles you cite. So I would continue to pray about it, seeking guidance, but I think the burden of proof should be high. I wouldn’t just stroll into it.
And With the Judgment Ye Judge
Please tell me you saw that RISE AND FALL OF MARS HILL just released another episode where they put themselves under the microscope. Lots of interesting and troubling dialogue in that episode with key Christianity Today leaders. I’d love your perspective/response on what they shared.
Jonathan, I haven’t listened to any of the Rise and Fall episodes, regarding them as unedifying click bait. But given the recent stories coming out of CT, it seems to me that the only thing fitting would have been for them to release a statement that they had been an institution that was an utterly unqualified critic of Mark Driscoll, and that they were going to stop it now.
I was wondering if you could answer a question for your videos you do with Ben Merkle. What is the balance between being a Pastor and pursuing side jobs such as writing and podcasting? In Christ,
Noah, I don’t regard the writing and podcasting as side gigs—it is not as though I am tentmaking or bivocational. I regard it all as kingdom work, although I do have different lines of authority depending on the task.
When to Launch
Thank you for taking the time to read my question. I do not reference a given article, but rather I seek your counsel. My younger cousin has been attending a private Christian school for all of his upbringing. As he matures, his parents are considering enrolling him in a public school for high school, out of fear they may shelter him too much. I’ve encouraged them not to, citing the boy’s love for Christ and is growing as a disciplined young believer, being very bright and mature spiritually, why throw him into the lion’s den just because he’ll be in high school!? What else can I tell them that would seriously prompt them to reevaluate this consideration? This boy, although only twelve, talks about seminary and even his pastor sees him as a strong contender for the faith.
Elle, while it is true that young Christians need to launch sometime, and interact with unbelievers at some point, in my experience, this should not be done without full preparation—a complete Christian grounding—first. And in my experience, a young man just entering high school is extremely unlikely to be in that position.
Vax and the Military
Didn’t know another way to thank you. However, regardless where people stand on the Vax itself, I’d like to thank you for your links to assistance for DOD personnel. As a 9 year leader in the Army, I did take it. People can debate all day about the validity and efficacy of it (and as the days roll on, it’s clear it’s not effective). The one thing we forget though is that most have “moved on” from this since other world events. However, many soldiers are still stuck with repercussions or declining an ineffective Vax, many of whom are amazing soldiers. So I was able to share your resources with them. Something many leaders aren’t doing while “taking care of their soldiers.” So thank you for that.
Nathan, you are most welcome.
I just have a question. You spend a lot of time giving instruction for husbands, and for wives in their respective roles in marriage. I appreciate the information and the encouragement. My husband listens to your podcasts and reads some of your writings, but there seems to be a disconnect between what he hears, what he states he believes, and what he does. I suppose there is a disconnect in all of us to some degree—sin. We’ve been married for twenty-five years. In the first five years of our marriage I found my husband had been lying to me about a decade long struggle with porn. Early on in in our marriage, I asked him to go to biblical counseling with me. He refused. The last time I asked him was about three years ago and he again refused. I don’t ask anymore. I want to say I don’t care, but obviously I’m bothered otherwise I wouldn’t be writing to you.
I don’t believe he views porn anymore, but he still ‘enjoys’ the occasional rated R movie with nudity. I leave the room and want nothing to do with them. He continues to watch, seemingly without introspection nor conviction to do otherwise. He says “I’m holier than thou” and too sensitive—that watching these movies is no big deal. What say you? Am I being too sensitive?
J, from this distance it is hard to say whether you are being too sensitive, but it doesn’t sound like it. If you don’t think he is using porn, then it seems that you want counseling because of other issues in your marriage. Or do you want counseling because of the occasional R movie? If the problems are serious, then I would do what it takes to bring things to a head. Ask again if you can get marriage counseling together. If he says no, then ask if you can get pastoral counseling by yourself.
What are your thoughts on the NKJV? Or the KJV2000?
For children who are learning to read the Bible, what’s a good starter? The KJV would seem too cumbersome for young ones.
Tyler, I think the NKJV would be fine for younger readers.
Do you preach from the original King James Version, or some version that’s been updated to remove the Scriptures that many biblical researchers now believe were added a bit after the fact (such as Mark 16:9-20)?
Ian, the KJV was regularly updated for several centuries before the accommodations were made with textual criticism. The Bible I use has the pericope of the woman caught in adultery, and the last twelve verses of Mark.
Any book recommendations on fearing God? Thanks!
Shawn, yes. The Fear of God by John Bunyan, and Rejoice and Tremble by MIchael Reeves.
I was reading your answers to people’s questions a couple weeks ago and read an answer in which you recommended a book on the historical development of feminism in the United States. Any chance that you know what that title might have been? I can’t remember what day I was reading, what question it was, and definitely not the title you recommended.
I appreciate any help you are willing to give in regard to this topic.
Alicia, the book was The Feminization of American Culture by Ann Douglas
You do great apologetics in your articles / book / posts / answers to letters. PLEASE consider writing a short, basic book, with concrete examples, on how to DO apologetics. It would be beneficial to your readers, and to the church!
James, that is a good idea. I will mull on it.
To my knowledge it is your view that trinitarian baptism obligates a person to obey the new covenant. I concur, from what I see in Romans 6, Galatians 3 etc. I am reading through Hebrews 9 and 10, I can’t help but think we are being taught that the blood of the covenant sanctifies and enjoins one to the covenant, thereby obligating them to keep it. Exodus 24:8 is referenced in chapter 9 verse 19, where Moses sprinkles “the people” and enjoins them to the covenant, and it is the same blood that v13 says “sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh.” Then, as you know, 10:30 says that apostates called “my people” will be judged, because they “counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified” an unholy thing.
Would love to hear your thoughts on how trinitarian baptism and its obligations, relate to these obligations on the person that come about by being sanctified by the blood of Christ.
Jonty, the sacraments of the new covenant obligate us to keep the new covenant. But the only way to keep the covenant is through faith, by faith from first to last. And so to receive the sacraments is to obligate one to trust God for everything.
Inflation or Deflation
RE: Inflation, Debt, and the Future I watched your video with David Bahnsen (Canon Plus is fantastic by the way) and was thinking about this idea of foretelling doom. I’ve thought for years how right those hard money conservatives are about debt/inflation and have been wandering about, staring at the heavens, wondering when it was gonna all go crash. His explanation makes much more sense, going out in a whimper makes much more sense.
Do you think that’s how this how our sin resolves itself both personally and nationally? Europe went out with a whimper. The USSR went out with a whimper. Men I know who didn’t take lay the axe to the root of the tree go out in a whimper. Sure, sometimes it’s a spectacular display of fireworks like martial conquest or the prostitution sting arrest; it just doesn’t seem like the norm.
I’ve been half hoping things here in the states would come to some ugly head, just so we could get on with being done with our foolishness. But I would hazard a guess that we will just meander down mediocrity lane on our way to hell (if we don’t repent).
Do you agree? Or do you think we have, in the true American fashion, shown the world the first class, no foolin’ way to anger God such that it will be fireworks. Pun intended.
Thanks always for your answers
Thomas, I think that apart from repentance, and a massive revival, we will go out with the staggers.
A Santa Claus Question in the Springtime
I’ve got me one of those wonderful Christian women. Diligent, wise, faithful in the study of Scripture, beautiful, and on top of that, we get along great. We’re moving towards marriage now. We only have a minor disagreement: how/if we do Santa with our kids one day! I don’t want to, she wants to—not to the typical American extent, but some nonetheless. This isn’t a massive deal to me, but how can we discuss this graciously, and with patience?
Mike, in my mind it is not a question of Santa/no Santa, but rather a question lying/no lying. If Santa is part of the celebration, and the kids are not being lied to, then I don’t see a problem with it. It is not a story I care for that much, but if the kids know that it is a story, a decoration, then I don’t see a difficulty.
Yikes Is Right
Quote from CT article trying to reconcile Genesis with evolutionary thought. “If a concern for evangelism is still one of the hallmarks of evangelicalism, pastors and lay leaders especially need to stop drawing needless lines in the sand on evolution and the interpretation of early Genesis. It only pushes people away from Christ.“
Have these CT folks been comatose for these past 2 years?
Blair, I suspect the answer to your question is yes.
A Couple Lines of Criticism
To be honest, I find your ministry to be incredibly damaging. The chief reason centers, of course, around your views of masculinity and femininity. Your dominant images for both are fundamentally *violent*; he “penetrates, colonizes, conquers,” and she “surrenders, receives, and accept.” Surrendering assumes conflict; it’s the yielding up of a conflict. Pope John Paul II’s Theology of the Body lays the foundations for just as totalizing of a view of masculinity and femininity (I agree that egalitarianism leads to androgynism) is so much more robust and beautiful. JPII pointed out that our bodies tell our stories; masculinity fundamentally *gives its life* for the flourishing of the other, and so is first in the order of loving strength rather than pre-eminence. That doesn’t diminish him at all or turn him into a “beta male” if done right; he is to, like Jesus, strongly confront the cross, bear it, and pour out his life. Or to use the pre-Fall image, she proceeds from his very side. He gives of his very self for her life. She, in turn, responsively transforms; her body tells that story. In sexual consummation, she receives and transforms that which is given from his life. She nurtures it, and in her vocation of “help” she is known to be a perfecter of life—bringing the initiating act of love from him to its completion in herself. That’s an image for the overarching dynamic form that organizes their relationship to each other in marriage.
Isn’t that so much more beautiful than your image? Why bash servant leadership as a beta vocation if it means this—the initiating strength of self giving love?
Sean, if you compare JP2’s vision to the vision taken off a scary meme made by my enemies, then I confess that I much prefer the former. But if you gathered up all the lovely things you attribute to JP2, it would be the work of fifteen minutes to find a Protestant expression of those same sentiments in my books on marriage. One of those books is even entitled My Life for Yours.
Re: A Matter of Rank
I have struggled with the biblical view of a woman’s role a lot. I agree that after the Fall, Eve was punished according to her sin. She wanted to be God, therefore she would have that tension all her life and would be subject to a man. However, I disagree with Doug’s one comment: “what they are by virtue of creation and what they are as a result of the Fall. In the order of creation, the woman is a man’s helper and companion, suitable for him.”
To me that does not infer the man is over her. She has a different role than he does, but we do not know how that relationship would have played out if Adam and Eve had not sinned. I guess you could argue that the Son and Spirit are under God and so mankind would also have that submission component. Maybe it is just wishful thinking on my part, but I think Doug may be taking liberty with submission BEFORE the Fall. I do not disagree with submission in marriage but part of that is because I have a strong, yet gentle husband. I can see how many who have not had examples like that to follow want to throw the baby out with the bath water.
Lorraine, my view is that had there been no sin, no Fall, there would still have been headship and submission. But without the presence of sin, it would have been a frictionless thing—very different from what goes on in our fallen experience.
Well, it would seem everyone is gradually losing interest in the conflict over in Emerging Democracy™ Ukraine, with erstwhile Good Guy Vlad Zelensky (who, in a fit of unbridled Democracy™, banned opposition parties and nationalized media) battling Satan himself, Vlad Putin.
Too bad, as it was the Grammys, which barely missed an all-time ratings low, where Zelensky made another one of his famous Zoom appearances, replete in his trademark olive drab t-shirt.
Because that’s what real, serious national leaders do when their nation is fighting for its life.
Maybe Putin and Z-Dawg should both get a Nobel Prize for destroying COVID, since it seems to have disappeared from the news cycle. So have the Branch Covidians on this site, who used to shame others weekly about getting the jab as if it were a sacrament. With the data released for the military and other news quietly surfacing, I’m happy to be a pure blood.
One could wish it were not so, but banning Russophile opposition parties looks like a reasonable response in a situation where Zelensky’s “Nazi regime collaborators… those to whom the death penalty or imprisonment will not apply,” can look forward to “forced labor to restore the destroyed infrastructure as punishment for Nazi activities,” once the “Nazi… Armed Forces of Ukraine” are liquidated, “as well as the military, information, and educational infrastructure that ensures their activity.” And this is quite the rosy picture of 20th century Soviet motivations: “Russia did everything possible to save the West in the 20th century. It implemented… Read more »
TCFK, perhaps it isn’t a lack of interest in Ukraine, but a realization that the news media is pushing propaganda on all sides of this situation. Too many photos have been shown to be from other conflicts or years old in the Ukraine. Too many news articles have exactly the same talking points without independent verification. As Cherrera noted, the Kung Flu just magically went away. Perhaps it is realization that the sanctions aren’t significantly hurting Russia, but instead are hurting middle class folks in Europe and the US. Gas prices spiked immediately even though in the US it takes… Read more »
Now that half the U.S. has blue-and-yellow all over their social media and is cheering Ukraine like their favorite football team, you have to wonder–what are we being distracted from? Not to mention the oh-so-important Will Smith slap that’s gripped the nation for the last week or two (even though a certain MSNBC host told white people to “sit this one out” as their comments aren’t welcome–gotta love “antiracism”!). Here’s one huge ongoing problem our Ministry of Truth is completely ignoring:
Anyone who says this isn’t an invasion is either blind or a liar! – YouTube
The Wuhan flu didn’t “magically” go away. The winter spike died down, as spikes do, and in fact cases were already declining before the invasion. (E.g. https://polimath.substack.com/p/every-states-covid-numbers-in-context-5c2?s=r predicts, on Jan 26, that the spike would collapse in most states by mid-to-late-February.) Of course, the media in general didn’t bother telling us this ahead of time, because a) they are too ignorant to understand the cyclic, mostly-seasonal nature of spikes, b) they would prefer to suppose that virus spikes can be controlled by specific, mostly-useless interventions like vaccines, masks, and distancing, and c) they are too driven by fear, personally and… Read more »
There’s no question that seasonality is a big factor for COVID along with other respiratory viral infections. However, Biden repeatedly warned of a “winter of death” coming in late 2021 and early 2022. It was a big selling point of his mandatory jab campaign. However, he shut up about it quickly when the COVID deaths for this past winter were considerably less than the previous winter. And of course he never apologized for his outlandish prediction–or to those who lost jobs due to their jab refusals (still a big issue in the military). Also, the methodology of COVID death counts… Read more »
Accounting is a good way to hide what is really happening in the world. If you raise prices during a hurricane you are gouging and taking advantage of those in need. If you raise prices during a conflict which has nothing to do with American gas prices you are gouging, but it is called accounting or timing speculating on what the costs of future product will cost. Note: The natural gas lines from Russia through the Ukraine are still pumping just as before the shooting started. The Ukraine is making oodles of rubles by keeping the gas moving. Note: Don’t… Read more »
Dave, I really don’t think there’s much “gouging” at gas stations. There are speculators and hedgers in the crude oil and gas futures markets. Understandably, they bid prices up when a war breaks out or a new (p)resident is all about shutting down pipelines, not approving new leases and pushing completely unproven “green energy” fairy tales. I’ve also known gas station owners. They make a lot more money on cigarettes, beer, snacks and drinks than gas, where profit margins are very low.
Question: How Do Gas Stations Make Money – SeniorCare2Share
Cherrera, the gouging is by the gas companies and our politicians. Exxon and other companies are showing record profits. Our government is shuttering exploration, renovating old equipment or building new refineries, discouraging US oil production. Of course, the stations make money on the goodies inside. There are still no reasons for the higher prices. There are plenty of excuses. Why were we told months ago that there would be a fertilizer shortage? Why were we told last year that there would be a winter heating oil and gas shortage and that there would be higher prices this spring? Why won’t… Read more »
We’re being played in many ways. You mentioned fake news (photos, videos) coming out of Ukraine. Here’s another one.
Viral “Russian Mobile Crematorium” Tweet Is From An 8-Year-Old YouTube Video | ZeroHedge
Elle, at any public high school, some of the teachers are hostile to Christianity. As your cousin if they want their son educated by men and women who are hostile to their beliefs.
“Men and women”!? How dare you! You’re leaving out trans teachers at our beloved government schools! I’m a Transgender Teacher. Here’s Why I Came Out at My School (Opinion) (edweek.org). According to the he/him who wrote the article:
“Schools are some of the most binary-gendered spaces in our society. Every adult uses the honorific ‘Mr.’ or ‘Ms.’ Dress codes and uniforms often differ for boys and girls. The building has a boys’ bathroom and a girls’ bathroom—single-stall, gender-neutral facilities are seldom an option.”
But I’m sure the DIE (Diversity-Inclusion-Equity) totalitarians will change that!
From your British readership re the National Review post, and “what fork to use when dining with the queen”; Common folk are briefed, prior to entering her majesty’s presence, on any matters of etiquette they may need. The etiquette demands are high, but so is the grace to provide one with the wherewithal to meet those demands.
The don’t-share-too-much advice reminds me of Sense and Sensibility. Marianne quickly finds out what Willoughby feeeeeeels about everything, but she doesn’t know his character. Colonel Brandon, on the other hand, probably felt more deeply than Willoughby was capable of, but knew how to keep his own counsel. Marianne knew that his character was impeccable, but it took her a while to appreciate it. Which is to say, there’s a flip-side application of this principle for the ladies. It’s all in Austen, man.
How anyone could want a Willoughby when there’s a Colonel Brandon around is beyond me!
Excellent observations as usual Kyriosity. Jill, I would guess that you may be forgetting the age difference between Willoughby and Colonel Brandon and that Willoughby was much closer to Marianne’s age, but I take your point. I highly doubt either of us would immediately think well of a nearly-40-year-old soldier taking interest in a daughter who is not yet 20.
But also it is not 1810. Our attitudes would likely be very different if we lived in that time, where age differences were regarded as less important provided all parties qualified as adults.
I would find it worrisome now but people didn’t back then. They really didn’t have a category for young women who are technically old enough to marry but are too young to be regarded as fully adult. Once you emerged from the schoolroom, lowered your hems, put up your hair, and began attending parties with your mother and older sisters, you were “out” and age differences were not considered all that significant. Of course, that depended on the older gentleman having a sterling reputation–older (and younger) libertines were kept well away from virginal girls in society for the first time.… Read more »
I’ll chip in to say that outside of high society large age gaps weren’t common in 19th century England or before. Hajnals research indicates that the median age at first marriage for men and women in areas with the western European marriage pattern (with England as exemplar) was around 23 and 26 respectively. It floated around a bit, and generally went up when there was economic hardship. But the gap never averaged more than 4 years. This is a marked difference from most other places where girls were married soon after puberty, often by 16 or 17. The upper classes… Read more »
Very successful older men in most societies have a tendency to marry much younger women.
In the 16th century, three of the men memorialized on this wall contracted marriages with age gaps of 20 years, 37 years and 50+ years – though only the latter two were to teenagers.
Very clever jab, John! Of course this is true, as we can see from recent presidential history. Of course, there are often less official liaisons as well. Though of all of those marriages Calvin’s is the oddest. He married once, when he was already a very powerful man, to a widow with children much older than himself. Beza’s second marriage also isn’t much of a scandal, as it was clearly contracted in the mutual interest of both parties and the second wife was a widow. Knox and Farel marrying teenagers as old men is/was more scandalous. When farel (almost 70… Read more »
What would you (anyone here) consider a maximum acceptable age gap? My 2 cents worth, it partly depends on how old both of them are. Sixty and forty doesn’t seem the same as forty and twenty, doesn’t seem so much like robbing the cradle I guess. It’s not good if she is closer to any of his children’s age than to his own age. It is irresponsible for a man to father children past a certain age – off hand I’d say about 50 or 55 – and not good for a man that age to marry a woman with… Read more »
The standard modern formula (for men over 20) is that marriage to a woman half the man’s age plus 7 years is not creepy.
So 22 / 18, 30 / 22, 40 / 27, 60 / 37.
Is it actually anyone else’s business?
In general, yes. Both for those directly advising young people, and for everyone with regards to establishing and maintaining norms. Societies where the ordinary marriage is between a 15 year old girl and a 35 year old man are very different from those where the median marriage is a 21 year old girl and a 24 year old man. Those things are partially downstream from other commitments, but if you don’t have to have an ideal.
You don’t have to be so wooden that you can’t recognize that there will be reasonable exceptions.
Someone else’s, yes. The families of the potential couple, if no one else.
I don’t understand your comment about Calvin. His wife was nine years his senior; her children could hardly have been older than he was. 🤔
Poor writing, and use of commas!
The Panda eats(,) shoots and leaves.
Nearly 40? He’s scarcely five-and-thirty. Hardly near to death, whatever Marianne may think.
Marianne was 16 which is still a near 20 year difference .
Book of the month “The Lord Gave the Word,” by Malcolm Watts, can be found free online. About 30 pages.
From Pearl Harbor to Calvary. It was written by the lead pilot of the Battle of Pearl Harbor. He survived and became a Christian.
Your blog and best selling Christian books by Keion Henderson, https://www.keionhenderson.com/books/ were my staple reading materials when the onset of COVID happened and I really thank you for really helping me get through those tough times!
Just wanted to say how much I loved looking through your webpage.