Rem Acu Tetigisti

You, sir, are a loser at life. That’s a fair-minded statement.Mary
Mary, you’re telling me! Fair-minded? Are you kidding me? If you knew just a tiny fraction of what God knows about me . . . man! . . . but on the other hand, I sing hymns that call me worse names than that.
Two Views of Israel
I would like your thoughts on the application of Genesis 12:3 in the current Israel discourse today. Currently, my fellow elder and I are going back-and-forth on its meaning/application, with me taking the view that Paul interprets that passage, in Gal. 3, as being Abram (not Israel) and his Seed (Jesus) . . . therefore, a New Testament application of Genesis 12:3 today would be more like “I will bless those who bless Christians, and curse those who curse Christians.” My fellow elder takes the common Dispensationalist application, that Genesis 12:3 is an imperative for us to bless the Jewish people, including the modern nation-state of Israel. (I have no problem with the former as a general ethic, but believe the latter causes many issues.)
Am I falling prey to any hermeneutic challenges with my view here? I know that “NT priority” hermeneutic can cause issues; my view is usually not that the NT reinterprets the OT, but rather makes application that was new, but equally valid–application that even the OT writers would have agreed with. What are your thoughts, and please direct me if you feel I could be missing something here.Ben
Ben, I believe that the Christian church is the legitimate heir of all the promises to Israel in the Old Testament. So that would be your view. But at the same time, I believe that ethnic Israel today is our apostate older brother, written out of the will. However, there is a New Testament prophecy concerning them in Romans 11, saying that they will in fact repent and turn back to Christ, and that will usher in the golden era of evangelism.
Training Toddlers
What do you recommend for training toddlers to obey commands the first time? My wife and I read Michael Brock’s 8 Errors Parents Make and How to Avoid Them (her family was a mess and mine is not Christian so neither of us have great examples to draw from) who recommended to give them a swat on the rear if they don’t obey the first time. We tried implementing Brock’s strategy and both sets of grandparents accused us of being too harsh. One of our elders recommended against it too. My wife and I are not expecting perfection from our daughter (we expect this will take time) but we need to teach our children to obey us promptly without being sinfully harsh. Thank you.
Sincerely,Brent
Brent, no, that is not too harsh at all. At the same time, I would recommend that unless something is really egregious that you don’t administer swats around your parents. After a few years, they will be saying, “Why you spanking them? They’re the best grandchildren we’ve got!” Ummm . . .
The Cost of Discipleship
I’ve recently had a family member inquire about Christ and is counting the cost of what it means to follow Him. One of their sticking points is a concern that their partner will leave them if they become a Christian. Do you have any advice on how to counsel them through this?
Thanks.Jason
Jason, you should of course be kind, but the issue itself is a non-negotiable The thing that matters is whether Christ rose from the dead, and not whether that reality will be costly for us if we acknowledge it. And Jesus did say that whoever loved his spouse more than Christ could not be His disciple (Luke 14:26).
Carnivorous Christians?
There is a lot of crap on the internet pressuring Christians not to eat meat. I can think of no one better to address this scripturally. Please do a write-up that I can share with these people who are ignoring 1 Timothy 4Stephen
Stephen, thanks. I didn’t know that issue had erupted again. I will file that away.
Pastoral Search
I am beginning to serve on a pastoral search committee. What advice would you give for me? Also do you have any advice for finding out whether a pastor is capable of fending off the wolves?Matthew
Matthew, in addition to all the standard questions you might ask, make a point of inquiring closely into his home life, state of his marriage, and the behavior of his kids. In addition to that, ask to see all his social media accounts, and have someone review them. And then third, ask him who he voted for in the last three elections, and why. The main thing there would not be the candidate, but rather his reasoning.
On Getting Around
I have been familiar with you on YouTube. What a blessing yesterday when pastor mentioned you! I know your views are controversial in our culture today, but they are biblical. And I am thankful that you speak the truth.
We have a school at our church, and the school year begins today. The men, parents, and teachers are reading ‘Why Children Matter.’Roxanne
Roxanne, thanks very much.
Dealing With a Sloppy Child
Need some input on child discipline. Our middle daughter has always done very well academically (at a CCS). She is almost always kind, and thoughtful to others, and has a servant heart. As a 13-year-old she has mild challenges with attitude, but for the most part she has maintained a good attitude. All of this being said our major challenge is she’s is very forgetful, messy, and slow with things. As I said, somehow she has managed to maintain almost straight A’s since 3rd grade, and yet her desk is always a total mess. She will almost always leave coats, or other important things at school, and leaves a trail wherever she goes. I don’t want to break her spirit because it does seem somewhat unintentional and possibly a personality thing , but I wonder if you had any insight on how to approach discipline towards this.Simmer
Simmer, it sounds very much like a personality thing, but it still needs to be addressed as best you can. I would begin by assigning her one task, a relatively simple one. Take the desk in her bedroom, for example, and every day before breakfast, the top of it has to be cleared off and cleaned. You inspect it every morning. Do that until it is not a big deal anymore. This will encourage both you and her. Then add something else, equally trivial. In the meantime, keep going back to school to get her coat.
Delaying Infant Baptism
Is there sin in temporarily delaying infant baptism?
I’m in a situation where I am attending a faithful Baptist church plant in my area, we have deep relationships with all there and with the pastor most of all. I decided, despite this, that I, my wife, and baby boy will move this spring to an area with an ACCS school for my boy’s education. We’re also planing on attending a CREC church there. In the process of this year, God has convinced me of the biblical validity of infant baptism. I don’t quite know what advice I’d get from my pastor, but I don’t personally know any paedobaptists so I have to ask; Is there sin in me waiting for my boy’s baptism until we move? Is it best to move membership to a PCA church for four months, then move? I want to do the will of God, but am lacking discernment and counsel.
Thank you for reading and may God bless,J
J, no, there is no sin in waiting for this reason. You are keeping your baptismal vow by maintaining peace and good order in the body. Move, and then baptize.
That Open Letter to Trump
Regarding your open letter to Trump, I reckon with his attention span he would have fallen asleep after the second paragraph . . . far too verbose, what does the wise man say about a word fitly spoken.Ian
Ian, I have no doubt that the president has heard simpler statements of the gospel, many times. The problem with them is that they can easily be fitted into his preexisting assumptions. My thinking was that there needed to be some kind of change-up pitch.
I just listened to your Open Letter to President Trump About Heaven. Hopefully, not only will the President see/hear it but also all the knuckleheads out there like Russell Moore and all the anti-FVers, etc. that have over the years accused you of promoting something other than the Gospel of Jesus Christ with your views. Carry on.Ken
Ken, thanks. Okay, carrying on.
An Antebellum Sin
I’m writing as part of an ongoing research project examining antebellum Christian moral reasoning regarding slavery, with particular attention to the theological treatment—or neglect—of sexual exploitation within the slave system, commonly referred to in period sources as the “fancy trade.”
My investigation so far suggests that while numerous nineteenth-century Southern theologians defended slavery as biblically sanctioned, none appear to have addressed the sale or sexual use of enslaved women as a distinct moral question. Their silence poses an important problem for understanding how theological frameworks of hierarchy, providence, and “domestic order” interacted with sexual ethics.
For example, in A Brief Examination of Scripture Testimony on the Institution of Slavery (1841), Thornton Stringfellow argued that
“The relation of master and slave is authorized by the Word of God . . . It is founded in the law of nature, and sanctioned by patriarchal usage, by the precepts of the Mosaic economy, and by the conduct of the apostles,” concluding that when practiced “upon the principles of humanity and justice which the Scriptures inculcate, [slavery] is not only lawful but benevolent” (p. 19) [1]
Likewise, James Henley Thornwell, in his 1850 sermon “The Rights and Duties of Masters,” insisted that
“The relation of master and slave stands on the same footing with those of husband and wife, parent and child . . . The Scriptures recognize it as an ordinance of God,” and maintained that “It is no evil in itself. The abuse of the relation is indeed a grievous sin; but the relation itself is lawful and right” (Collected Writings, IV: 384-386.) [2]
By contrast, the abolitionist Theodore Dwight Weld assembled contemporary newspaper evidence showing how such theological frameworks indirectly legitimized sexual commerce. In American Slavery As It Is (1839), Weld recorded:
“Advertisements may be found in the New Orleans and Natchez papers, offering for sale ‘fancy girls’—a well-understood term, signifying young and handsome mulatto females, for purposes of prostitution” (p. 22) [3]
He concluded, “Let it be remembered that these atrocities exist under the sanction of law, and in a land calling itself Christian” (p. 25.)
Against that background, I would value your perspective on the following questions:
Are you aware of any theological treatises, sermons, or confessional statements—particularly within Reformed or Presbyterian traditions—that explicitly justified, condoned, or conversely condemned masters’ participation in the “fancy trade” or in the sexual commerce of enslaved persons?
Have any modern scholars or denominational bodies produced analyses or statements addressing this specific dimension of slavery and theology?
My aim is historical-theological clarification rather than polemic: understanding whether and how moral reasoning failed when confronted with the sexual economy of slavery may illuminate broader patterns of doctrinal silence in Christian ethics.
If you know of primary sources, secondary analyses, or current research addressing this topic, I would be most grateful for your recommendations.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
With sincere regards,
References
[1] Thornton Stringfellow, A Brief Examination of Scripture Testimony on the Institution of Slavery (Richmond: J. W. Randolph, 1841), 19.
[2] James Henley Thornwell, The Collected Writings of James Henley Thornwell, Vol. 4 (Richmond: Presbyterian Committee of Publication, 1873 [orig. 1850]), 384-386.
[3] Theodore Dwight Weld, American Slavery As It Is: Testimony of a Thousand Witnesses (New York: American Anti-Slavery Society, 1839), 22-25.John
John, I am afraid I won’t be a ton of help. I do know that Dabney condemned the sexual use of slaves, but I don’t remember where I read it. Perhaps some of our readers could help. He said that a slave woman should be the absolute mistress of her own body, or something like that. The rest of them would have condemned it as a species of fornication, because the slaves being used that way did not have any legal status (like that of a concubine). The best place to look, I believe would be in the works of Eugene Genovese, and his wife Elizabeth Fox-Genovese.


Anybody else unable to see all but Doug’s first response?
Was it on purpose that you agreed with the first commenter about being a loser at life and then posted all the letters without your responses to any of them? If so, bravo. However, when you get a chance there are some letters I would like to read your responses.
No, just an accident. Everything’s there now.
Hello Brent, I agree with your understanding of Genesis 12:3, but I think it could be expanded a bit more to keep a clear continuation between us and Israel. Here’s my understanding of Genesis 12:3: In Genesis, God creates mankind (communally) to be his children/son. To be created in God’s image and likeness, implies having a father/son relationship with him (see Genesis 5:1-3). But after the fall into sin, God will put division between his people (the offspring of the Woman) and Satan’s people/offspring. A major theme of Genesis is, “who is the offspring of the Woman?” After mankind as… Read more »
Brent, don’t do it. That all infractions, from toddler-dom onwards, should be met with the same response, a swat on the rear, every time, is a doctrine of men, not of God’s word. I once read a helpful definition of what a Pharisee is: someone who doesn’t make allowances for context: someone who applies their wooden little rules no matter what. And why? Because they’re afraid that if they don’t precisely follow their little rules, then disaster will follow. If we’re not tough on sin (which we’ll arbitrarily take to mean “spank every time”), then it’ll all go terribly wrong!… Read more »
Well said
” .. and his [God’s] goal is to train us to love righteousness, not to breed resentment.”
Although this subject has been somewhat done to death here recently, I think your sentence here describes where we should be going on this one.
J, you ask a question about specifics related to infant baptism. How are you going to work out whether Douglas Wilson’s answer is what God says, or mere human opinion?
Baptism is one of those things where Scripture refers to those who can eat meat and those who cant or those who hold to his position or that each answering to our own Master. I am an ardent credobaptist, but I know that Doug isn’t in sin by his answer.
> “He said that a slave woman should be the absolute mistress of her own body, or something like that.”
Which is to say, she shouldn’t be enslaved. Amen, amen and amen.
I’m wondering what Pastor Wilson thinks slavery is, other than someone else claiming to be the master of your body?
And again, well said. Slavery was wrong…there should be no justification or room for approval…what would Jesus do? Free the slaves…and call it what it was, abhorrent.
Ken, when you read the presentation of the gospel to Trump, you failed to discern the unorthodox elements. Note that nowhere is it mentioned that Christ voluntarily came, out of love for his people. The description is entirely in line with Douglas Wilson’s eternal subordinationism: it is presented only in terms of an action of the Father. Christ’s atoning death is something that the Father did to the Son. Christ was obliged to endure what the Father willed for him, rather than presenting a free offering. Read it again. A book like https://www.amazon.com/Son-Who-Learned-Obedience-Theological/dp/1532641702 can help you understand the theological importance… Read more »
Did you forget your own advice to Brent advising him to not be a blockhead? Have you forgotten Jesus asking that the cup of our sins be taken away? Instead, Jesus was obedient to the will of the Father. Voluntary or involuntary? or both?
Don’t be so uptight with your wooden responses.
It was still willful on Jesus’ part…He could have not gone through with it, which I think is the point David was making. He chose to sacrifice Himself for ALL people…
Gutenberg has a couple of books entitled History of the Negro Race in America. It was written in 1890 and follows the legal history of slavery in each of the original 13 colonies. At least part of the books do. It would be a good resource.