These are the best of times and the worst of times, to coin a phrase. For conservatives, I mean. These are the worst of times because a dedicated band of people is doing quite a demolition job on the republic, and it really takes a lot of work to get that much damage done. Impressive, after it’s own fashion, but it is still kind of dreary to watch. These are the best of times because if your job is to fight lunacy, we live in a time when there is apparently a lot of job security. Kind of like being the first logger west of the Cascades.
Rules for Patriots is a very bracing take on the whole business, with a subtitle “How Conservatives Can Win Again.” Steve Deace is a conservative radio talk show host located in Iowa, which means that he has a choice spot on the curb for the periodic elephant parade. The Iowa caucuses mean that all the presidential wannabes and about three straggling extras make regular pilgrimages to Iowa in order to wow the populace, and this means that Steve Deace has seen the sausage made.
The book is an energetic explanation of why conservatives routinely get their shirts pulled over their heads, and their socks rolled down to meet the tops of their shoes. Deace distinguishes principled conservatives/libertarians from what he calls Republicrats — people whose specialty is losing, and explaining afterward, while we all sit there agape, that it must have happened because the candidate wasn’t mushy enough at the center.
First, I really liked the fact that Deace is a decided Christian, and doesn’t hide that fact in any out-of-the-way places. The tag line for his web site says a lot, and I think is calculated to ruffle all the right feathers. That tag line is “Fear God. Tell the Truth. Make Money.” Far from being someone who advocates a generic American civic religion, this is someone who prays in the name of Jesus.
Second, he deals with principles and not with methods. Like Alinsky’s work for the hard left, Deace is giving us instruction that is timely in this election cycle, but would also likely be timely twenty years from now. His chapters are dedicated to the development of different principles, and I will give you just a few. Chapter 3 is dedicated to “never attack what you are not willing to kill.” Chapter 8 is “define your opponent before he defines himself, and define yourself before your opponent defines you.” Chapter 4 is “never accept the premise of your opponent’s argument.” There is a lot of really good stuff here.
And last, he knows that politics is not beanbag. We are not running people for student council president so that we might have someone to organize the class parties. Deace knows that politics is a stand-in for civil war, and is a variation of it. The stakes are high, and very real. I was talking to a friend on the phone today, and he told me the story of a boxing coach who believed that it was his task to teach his boxers a very basic truth. He wanted to disabuse them of the idea, when they got in the ring, that “if they didn’t hit their opponent really hard, then their opponent might not hit them really hard.” Doesn’t work that way.
Politics being the way they are, I would expect to find disagreements with this book here and there. But these did not have to do with the principles themselves, but rather with applications to particular candidates and personalities, men like Gingrich and Trump, say. Because this is a book crammed full of principles, and so that doesn’t really matter. I learned a lot from Alinsky too, and he was a commie.
Anyone who is directly or peripherally engaged in politics needs to get this book, particularly as we approach the gaudy show of the 2014 congressional elections.
The commits are betting their future on race baiting. How should we address this?
K
Doug – “Fear God. Tell the Truth. Make Money.”
I think the Bible teaches these things, but on the make money part, it seems our form of capitalism morphed into “Put your neighbor our of business?” I’m having a hard time seeing how Walmart can be a part of a healthy or just capitalist economy.
Would love your thoughts,
CT
Of interest? Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World by Deirdre N. McCloskey.
Race baiting, what now? I’d suggest posing the question, “What happens to a nation when one’s race, tribe or clan matters more than the truth?” Then ask, ” Do you want that?” Clearly many Americans do, but I’m still naive enough to believe…to hope… that most wouldn’t care for it.
The left has been on a winning streak for several hundred years and I don’t see it ending any time soon no matter what strategy is employed against it. We live in a decadent and crumbling empire. Probably within the next 30 years it will be weak enough that the electoral process breaks down and we will have an ethnic leftist president for life like Hugo Chavez. It’s pretty sad, actually, to see earnest but naive conservatives get fired up with patriotic zeal.
Chris,
The savings I enjoy at Walmart allows me to do other things I otherwise would not be able to do. For example, enjoy local attractions/events and purchase things when I am there, join a CSA, start a small home business, buy things for my neighbors, travel more and enjoy other local communities (and spend money there). An encouragement to everyone to add http://cafehayek.com/ to your daily reading (especially Don Boudreaux’s posts which are very short and chock full of wisdom most of the time).
What I want to know is, why does everyone choose to criticize Walmart? What is it about that company, above all of the others, that causes it to receive every criticism from the not-happy-with-capitalism contingent? Has this company committed crimes unique to the culture? Has Target ever put someone out of business? How about Lowe’s? Or Ikea? Or Best Buy? How about every other large chain of franchises in the country?
Frankly, I think the cardinal sin of Walmart is that it’s uncool.
Chris,
I would echo Ethan’s comments but go even further. In a broad sense, capitalism always encourages capitalists to put each other out of business — by providing better (in some sense of the word) goods and services to consumers than the other guy. To wit — do you mourn for all those folks who lost jobs making and selling vinyl records? Buggy whips? Typesetting workers? The list goes on and on.
Thanks All, However, no one has addressed my real concern, which is our emphasis these days on ‘driving the competition out of business’. Why not just be happy with making a living. As to the Walmart. I’m not against Walmart, and I shop there myself. However, if you’ve ever lived in a small town, where many small community companies were driven out of business by having a Walmart open within a 30 mile radius, you’ll understand the dilemma. The same could be said for Lowe’s, etc. Walmart’s just a label that communicates exactly what I mean in the fewest letters… Read more »
If you’re making a profit, you’re putting someone else out of business. If you think you’re not, you just don’t understand economics. Which the common thread among all those who disparage Walmart. You will, tomorrow, buy some object or service that was on one identifiable date entered into the marketplace priced lower than that which it eliminated.
The rest is just romantic blather.
Yes, romantic in a conservative sense, if that is, there is anything left to conserve from our robust economic history. I’m thinking anti-trust laws were a good restraint at one time for the ill gotten desire to control a market and squeeze out any competition. And speaking of profits and squeezing folks out, one of the prophets of old had something to say about this as well. Woe to those who join house to house, Who add field to field Until there is no room, And you are made to dwell alone In the midst of the land. (Is 5:8)… Read more »
People criticize Wal-Mart because it isn’t trendy or “cool”. It markets to families and its stores are located primarily in small towns and suburbs; Wal-Mart maximizes profits, which is considered sinful by most liberals.
I heard Steve Deace on Wretched Radio (Todd Friel) (April 12) discussing abortion with leftist on Radio Europe. That discussion is here —> http://stevedeace.com/podcast/deace-on-talk-radio-europe/
Over all I thought he did well not quite a Collision.