Christ Kirk DC 2025

Sharing Options
Show Outline with Links

The Mystery of the Gentiles

Introduction

In Pauline terms, a mystery is not something that is hidden away from sight. Rather, a mystery is something that was for long ages hidden away, but which was now revealed in the new covenant. It is now out in plain sight, out in the open. The apostle does not say “there is still a secret hidden somewhere around here.” Rather he says, having taken the lid off the box, “this was the secret for so long.” Of course when a secret is revealed like this, it is no longer a secret . . . but it is still called the secret. It used to be the secret, but now it is the secret revealed. Here is the secret can be synonymous with here is the secret revealed

The Text

“For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel” (Ephesians 3:1–6).

Summary of the Text

So Paul was the apostle to the Gentiles (Rom. 11:13), and this was a mission that was more than a little bit controversial. His commitment to this mission symbolized by “the middle wall of partition being torn down” was why he was a prisoner. His imprisonment was for the sake of the Gentiles (v. 1). In Acts, when he was giving his testimony to a very surly crowd, they listened to him carefully right up to the point when he said the word Gentiles. Then they erupted again (Acts 22:22).

But he had been entrusted with the task of communicating the grace of God to those Gentiles, which the Ephesians had all heard about (v. 2). The mystery surrounding all of this had been given to Paul in a revelation, which Paul had written about to them earlier (v. 3). Perhaps he had written another letter, but quite possibly he is referring to the first few chapters of Ephesians. The theme of the first part of the book is certainly on point, and that would be consistent with his theme here, and so that is how I suggest we take it. More on what this word mystery means shortly.

When they read what he had written, they would then come to understand Paul’s knowledge of this mystery, which he here calls the “mystery of Christ” (v. 4). This mystery was hidden from the sons of men for “long ages” he says (v. 5), but now, now in the age of the gospel, the Holy Spirit has made this mystery known to the Lord’s holy apostles and prophets.

And so what is that mystery? It is that Gentiles should be heirs together with the Jews, members of the same body, and partakers of God’s promise in Christ through the gospel (v. 6). It is the unification of Jew and Gentile into one new man, that new man being called Christian.

The Olive Tree

In Romans 11, Paul speaks of the covenant people of God under the figure of an olive tree. This is how he writes of the transition between the old covenant and the new. We have one tree straddling the two covenant eras. The roots go deep, all the way back to Abraham.

We do not have an OT tree and a NT tree. He does not give us the olive tree of the Jews and the newly-planted apricot tree of the Gentiles. God does not plant a new kind of tree alongside the old one. He does not abandon the old fruit and start farming something else. The root is always Abraham.

There are some significant actions taken in this transition, but they are the actions of pruning and grafting. They are actions performed on the one tree, not actions that indicate a transfer from olive farming to apricot farming. Unbelieving Jews were cut out of the olive tree, and believing Gentiles, from wild olive tree stock, were grafted in.

This theological position is called supercessionism, and it is frequently expressed by the saying that the church is Israel now. All the promises given in the Old Testament are promises that the church has inherited. I take the point, and agree with it, but I think it would be better to say that Israel has been universalized, and that Israel is the church now—and that Israel is identified through the Christ. Unbelieving Jews who have not yet believed in Christ have been estranged from their own identity in some sense.   

In addition to all of that, as a means of keeping the Gentiles from becoming conceited and falling into the same trap that the unbelieving Jews had fallen into, Paul promised that a day was coming when the branches that had been cut out because of their unbelief would be grafted back in again. If the wild olive branches of Gentile stock could be successfully grafted in, then how much more would it be possible to graft the cultivated branches back in?

And so this brings us to a further distinction. I mentioned supercessionism a few moments ago. This position can be divided into two camps—the first is hard supercessionism, which is the view that the church has replaced ethnic Israel entirely, and Jews today are no more theologically significant that any other tribe—Laplanders, or Navajo, or Swedes. Then there is soft supercessionism, the view I take and which I urge upon you as the classic Reformed understanding. This is the view that in Romans 11 Paul predicts a glorious return of the Jews to Christ, and that this event will be the catalyst for the conversion of the whole world.   

This Mystery as Purloined Letter

Edgar Allen Poe once wrote a short story, a detective story, called The Purloined Letter. Now it might seem to you as though I am abruptly changing the subject, but not really. A criminal who knew that his apartment was going to be searched in pursuit of a sensitive letter that he was using for purposes of blackmail had the wit to hide the letter in plain sight.

God did something very similar when He wrapped this mystery up in layer upon layer of obviousness.

It is astonishing how powerful our religious preconceptions can be. We have very settled notions of what God can and cannot do. But when we try to predict what God is going to do, we usually are very wide of the mark. Having the Almighty God, the one who spoke the galaxies into existence, become a human being, starting out as a single cell, seems to us to be more than a little bit . . . irreverent.

And once He became a man, the obvious thing to us was that He needed to be made a king. The idea that He would be flogged and crucified did not enter our heads. Jesus could even tell His disciples flat out what was going to happen.

“Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be betrayed unto the chief priests and unto the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death, And shall deliver him to the Gentiles to mock, and to scourge, and to crucify him: and the third day he shall rise again.”

Matthew 20:18–19 (KJV)

And they still didn’t know. They were not outside tomb on Sunday morning, checking their watches saying, “Any moment now.”

And this mystery of the Gentiles . . . it is the same kind of thing. It was a true mystery, set out for us in plain sight. 

“And I will also take of them for priests and for Levites, saith the Lord.”

Isaiah 66:21 (KJV)

“O let the nations be glad and sing for joy: For thou shalt judge the people righteously, And govern the nations upon earth. Selah.”

Psalm 67:4 (KJV)

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Caleb
Caleb
20 days ago

Thanks for the article. The failure to see the Gentiles as being grafted into God’s one covenant people and recipients of the promises made to Abraham, along with the failure to see that the new covenant is made new/better through the better mediator has caused a lot of confusion in Christian circles. Often when the Old Testament is taught/preached, the characters are simply viewed as good or bad examples to be followed or avoided, rather than God’s overarching plan of salvation being proclaimed. I originally interpreted Romans 11 in the same way as you – that there will be a… Read more »

David Anderson
17 days ago
Reply to  Caleb

William Hendrickson’s commentary on Romans also lays out well the arguments for concluding that Paul is explaining a process that was at work fully in his own day, rather than prophesying a largely future process.

Andrew Lohr
19 days ago

Uh, “that any other tribe” should be “than any other tribe,” eh? (Middle of paragraph above last big headline.)

Ray D.
Ray D.
18 days ago

Doug, I saw that when you preached at Christ Church DC, that there were some “Handmaids” picketing you.

You should have taken the opportunity to inform them that their cosplay was not entirely accurate. Red is the color of Handmaids, who are young and fertile. At their age, the picketers would be wearing Green, for “Marthas”, or Brown, for “Aunts.”

If you advised them to change colors, and told them to “calm down”, it would certainly defuse the tension. You should try it next time.

Ray D.

Steve Perry
Steve Perry
18 days ago

Pastor Wilson. Steeped in the word, why is it that the apostle Paul calls it the mystery of the gentiles, when according to numerous reformed ministers, clearly in plain scriptural sight, Jethro, Zipporah and Gershom prefigured the inclusion of the gentiles, including their knowledge of the Passover/Gospel as demonstrated in Ex Ch 4:24-26? If they knew, how it is a mystery? Or is that just gnostic nonsense? 

David Douglas
David Douglas
18 days ago
Reply to  Steve Perry

My guess it is a mystery in the same way that even though Christ and his salvation was clearly foreshadowed and prophesied for millennia, it was still a surprise. If the rulers & etc. had known…they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.

David Anderson
18 days ago
Reply to  Steve Perry

In the Old Testament, Gentiles are incorporated into the Jewish nation. In the New Testament we come to see that God’s people was always intended to be multi-ethnic with no distinctively Jewish character. Gentiles do not circumcise their infants, keep the Jewish laws, or have their own particular theocratic territory. The things that kept Gentiles and Jews apart have been abolished – not by making Gentiles conform to them, but by doing away with them at the cross. Rahab and Ruth didn’t know much about that. The fact that God would incorporate Gentiles into the New Israel as *equal* members,… Read more »

Last edited 18 days ago by David Anderson
Gena K. Everitt
Gena K. Everitt
18 days ago

Pastor Doug, your sermon of 9/7 was quite illuminating to me. I now understand the mystery of the Gentiles in a deeper way than ever before. Reading Romans 11 this morning, the text has literally come alive for me. I do love when this happens!!!! Most meaningful was your statement “Paul predicts a glorious return of the Jews to Christ, and that this event will be the catalyst for the conversion of the WHOLE WORLD”. And verse 12 exploded with meaning as well to me. HOW MUCH MORE WILL THEIR FULL INCLUSION MEAN. I am deeply grateful to have heard… Read more »

David Anderson
17 days ago

In responsible evangelical theology, significant doctrines are not meant to be constructed on single, or small number of, difficult or obscure references. Such practices may gain followings for men trying to differentiate themselves in a crowded market, but they discourage actual loyalty to the Lord of the Word.

Scribbler
Scribbler
17 days ago
Reply to  David Anderson

The Lord often plants mighty oaks in thin soil. Melchizedek gets a few scattered lines, yet Hebrews crowns him with a priesthood beyond Aaron’s. That’s no crowded market trick, but God’s way of showing that treasure may lie in the footnotes for those loyal enough to dig.