And Gave Gifts to Men

Sharing Options
Show Outline with Links

Introduction:

As our congregation has grown and developed, our form of government has grown more defined along with it. To a certain extent, once we get used to it, we just function the way we function. But whenever we alter something, it generates questions that should always be answered from the Scriptures. Or other times it just occurs to someone to ask, as happened in our recent election of elders who are teachers.Plant From Bible

The Text:

“Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men . . . And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ” (Eph. 4: 8, 11–12).

Summary of the Text:

Before Jesus ascended into Heaven, He promised that He would send the Holy Spirit to replace Him. The Spirit’s work is to give gifts to men, and to generate fruit among men. The gifts of the Spirit include things like teaching, administration, exhortation, and so on. The fruit of the Spirit are things like love, joy, peace, patience, etc. The two are supposed to go together, but it doesn’t always happen that way. For example, the church at Corinth had every gift (1 Cor. 1:7), but when it came to spiritual maturity, they were still carnal (1 Cor. 3: 1-4). Someone can have a spiritual gift and be an unspiritual man.

Governed by Elders:

The New Testament teaches that each congregation is governed by a plurality of men, usually called elders (Acts 14:23), and sometimes called bishops (Phil. 1:1). The word translated elder is presbyteros and the word translated bishop or overseer is episkopos. We know these two offices are the same because the New Testament uses them interchangeably. Paul calls for the elders of the church at Ephesus (Acts 20:17), and moments later he speaks of them as bishops (Acts 20:28). Paul tells Titus to ordain elders in every city (Tit. 1:5), and says they must have a high character because a bishop must be blameless (Tit. 1:7). So then the highest authority in a local congregation is found in its session of elders.

Another body of men assists the elders in caring for the church on the practical side. These men are called deacons, from the word diakonos, which means servant.

Different Kinds of Elders:

But within the body of elders, the men have different callings and functions, according to their gifts. When the session votes on things, all the elders have the same role, and they all cast one vote. When the elders fan out to do certain things, they do so according to their assignments, their gifts and their abilities. In the rule of the church, they all have the same office. In the ministry of the church, they have different offices.

For example:

“Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine” (1 Tim. 5:17).

So note that we have elders who rule well (who are to receive payment) but then a distinction is made between them and other elders—the elders who in addition to ruling well work with “word and doctrine.” This means there are elders who rule well who don’t teach. And the implied elders who don’t rule well are probably not elders who rule poorly, but rather elders who come to the meetings and vote, but are not vocationally dedicated to the work. So we have unpaid elders, administrative elders, and teaching elders.

Now if some elders don’t teach, why is it required that elders be “apt to teach” (1 Tim. 3:2)? One possibility is that in the New Testament we have the beginning of a separation between elder and bishop, one that became obvious by the second century. Another possibility is that every elder should be capable of handling questions about doctrine, without having the gift of teaching, kind of like the deacons (1 Tim. 3:9). And a third possibility is that the word didaktikos should be translated “teachable.”

So what about pastors? The word there is poimen, shepherd. In our text from Ephesians, the word is placed together with teacher (pastor/teacher), meaning that pastors also teach. As a shepherd, a pastor not only instructs but also feeds. This is why a pastor is responsible for Word and sacrament.

Now the names of pastor and teacher are frequently used as stand-alone descriptions. For example, teachers are mentioned separately (Acts 13:1; 1 Cor. 12:29; Rom. 12:7).

So some men are simply elders. They participate in the rule of the church. Some men are elders who dedicate enough time to rule that they are administrators (1 Cor. 12:28), and are paid for their work (1 Tim. 5:17). Some men are elders, participating in the rule of the church, but they also teach the body (1 Cor. 12:29). And then last, some men are elders, participating in the rule of the church, but they also teach, preach, and administer the sacraments (1 Tim. 2:7).

We want these things to be clear in our minds, but while remembering that they are also organic.

“The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder [and an apostle], and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed: Feed [verb form of pastor] the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight [verb form of bishop] thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind” (1 Pet. 5:1–2).

A Brief Word About Translations:

In the PCA, there is a basic distinction between ministers who are called Teaching Elders (TE) and the other elders who are called Ruling Elders (RE). Our office of parish elder corresponds to their ruling elder. Our pastors (or ministers) would be TEs in the PCA, and our teachers wouldn’t correspond to anything. In the Reformation at Geneva, where the office of ruling elder was recovered, they were called seniors. The idea there was to include the laity in the governance of the church. At Geneva, they also had the office of teacher, which they called doctor. A distinction between the broader church and local church needs to be kept in mind.

Also keep in mind the distinction between office and function. The word elder is like our word senator. Presbyteros means old guy. Was Apollos ordained as a teacher, or did he just travel around teaching (Acts18:24-25)? What about a Christian who is not an officer in any church who publishes a book of teaching, and it takes off and becomes a best seller? Is he a teacher, and if so, what kind?

But always remember—all of this is a gift that Christ gave (Heb. 13:7, 17). We are everywhere taught to see the giver in the gift, and never to forsake the giver because of the gift. But neither are we to despise the giver by despising the gift. So the exalted Lord Jesus ascended beyond all glory and then He gave us . . . church government? Isn’t this like your favorite aunt letting you down on Christmas by giving you that ugly sweater, or nondescript socks? Not at all—and we must learn not to be that ungrateful kid at Christmas. We must learn to see Christ in His gifts, and when we learn to do this, we will then discover how many precious things ride on it.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Callaghan
John Callaghan
8 years ago

Might I suggest that, when deciding on a new form of church governance, more weight should be given to the form adopted by all Christians by the beginning of the second century AD than to the form selected by one man, in one town, in the middle of the sixteenth century?

Consistorian
8 years ago
Reply to  John Callaghan

Might I suggest that we reject your suggestion for at least two reasons?

First, our friends from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were much better students of the early church then any of us are, so why would we trust ourselves over them in this area?

Second, we have relatively little material from those early church days, so conjecture would have to fill in the blanks, and we’d rather have well thought out arguments from Scripture, than conjectures from the blank pages of church history.

Steve Perry
Steve Perry
8 years ago
Reply to  Consistorian

So Episcopacy is a conjecture from little material and blank pages of church history?

Consistorian
8 years ago

Excellent overview of the Church offices. You might add a bit on missionaries, like Paul and Barnabas.

Leslie Lea
Leslie Lea
8 years ago

I am not sure sur how you can imply or directly say, as you did, that spiritual gifts are only for men.

"A" dad
"A" dad
8 years ago
Reply to  Leslie Lea

1 Corinthians 12 27 Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it. 28 And God has placed in the church first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, of helping, of guidance, and of different kinds of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? 30 Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues[d]? Do all interpret? 31 Now eagerly desire the greater gifts. L’, I think Wilson understands that all godly people can have… Read more »

Valerie (Kyriosity)
8 years ago

I didn’t follow the bit about how “rule well” refers to those who serve vocationally. Is that just one of those “it means that in Greek” things, or is there a line of reasoning I’m missing?

bethyada
8 years ago

Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine Doug reasons like this (it seems) There are elders who rule well therefore there must be elders who are not in this category. They are not elders who don’t rule well, but rather those who do not rule. He identifies them as elders who vote but aren’t vocational elders. The elders who rule well are to receive “double honour” which many commentators think means that they are to be financially compensated. So 2 categories: paid elders who rule well… Read more »

Valerie (Kyriosity)
8 years ago
Reply to  bethyada

Now I’m not following *you*. ;-) First you say that the unpaid elders don’t rule, and then you say they do.

bethyada
8 years ago

Fair enough. I think all elders rule in that they offer spiritual oversight. That is what I consider the primary function of an elder. But to avoid more than one understanding of what it means to rule I have edited it. Does it make more sense now?

Compare say an CEO who rules a company and is your boss and the board who are not directly your boss but who, in some senses, rule the company.

bethyada
8 years ago

I see elders as being involved in the spiritual oversight and direction of the church. I think administration is seen by how the early church handled the widows: appointing deacons. So administrative roles can be done by deacons (with their qualifications). I would also note that the command in Timothy is that an elder not be a recent convert and that is not repeated in Titus. The elder in Titus is to hold fast to the Word however. This might just be a slightly different command though it seems possible that the church in Crete (Titus) is much younger than… Read more »

40 ACRES & A KARDASHIAN
40 ACRES & A KARDASHIAN
8 years ago

I can’t remember – is rhythm one of the gifts of the Spirit?

If so, whitey’s going to the hot place for sure.

The guy in the green shirt at 0:22 – there are no words.

And it’s the current year…

https://twitter.com/JemarTisby/status/771860033374007297

Christopher Casey
Christopher Casey
8 years ago

Yeah, Rythm, music, starlight, daisies in green pastures.

https://youtu.be/n85lS6l7adg

Joseph Wells
Joseph Wells
8 years ago

Pastor Wilson, I believe I follow your logic, and it seems sound to me, based on your reading of the text. This whole thing leaves me with one big obvious question, though:

What of episcopacy? In your (very presbyterian) view, is an episcopal system permitted although not required (like, say, pipe organs)? If you believe that the episcopal model is contrary to scripture, how far out on the distribution of error do you place it (like, just this side of “liturgical dance,” or right between intinction and speaking in tongues)?

john k
john k
8 years ago

It is difficult, based on the terms used for office and function in the New Testament, to limit the sacraments to the pastor-teachers. Unless the Ephesian elders of Acts 20 were exclusively “pastors” in our sense, they all, or all as a body, were told to feed/shepherd/care for the church, as also in 1 Peter 5:2. I’m not saying there might not be some other allowable basis.