Hauling In a Ten-Pound Fish on a Five-Pound Line

I am currently working my way through a fascinating book about Reformation-era music called Worship Wars in Early Lutheranism, written by Joseph Herl. It is a tightly-packed scholarly tome, but would be a great read for any pastor interested in musical reformation — as every pastor ought to be.

Church music can be divided into two broad categories. The first would be the music of trained musicians and choirs, at which the Lutherans excelled. They produced some of the greatest music that the human race has produced as of this point, and so we have to begin every discussion of this subject with that “where credit is due” acknowledgement.

But the other category is that of bringing congregations along. In this, the music of most churches in the Lutheran areas was atrocious. There were exceptions of grace — like Strassburg under Bucer, borderline not Lutheran, where the singing was good across the board. There were other exceptions in Lutheran areas, but in many places, the congregations sang very little, or anemically, or not at all. One of the reasons the Reformed areas did better in bringing congregations along is that their music was (deliberately) not as complicated.

Just a couple of examples should make the point. Services could be upwards of three hours long, with the middle hour occupied with the sermon. There were times when parishioners would hang around outside the church during the preliminaries, and when the sermon was going to start, somebody would give a signal to go in. And when the choirs were doing their complicated figural singing, sometimes the people would be given devotional material to read, in order to keep their minds on something spiritual. Most of the singing in most of the services was not done by the congregations. It was pretty bad.

Part of the reason it was bad is that some of it was so good. Bringing the people of God along is like hauling a ten-pound fish in on a five-pound line. Whatever you do, don’t yank. Church music ought to be overwhelmingly congregational music, but this means that the musically gifted have to be expected to bear with the weak, and not run on ahead.

It is easy enough to put this down on paper, but it is a hard balance to maintain. It seems that God has fashioned the world of church music in such a way that it seems you are going to be exasperating somebody. Reading this book has made me enormously grateful for what God has given us in our community. We really have it good.

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
 
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Douglas SRFBTom BrainerdAndrew Lohr Recent comment authors

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Andrew Lohr
Member

  Yay and amen.  It’s one thing to be convinced that Psalms ought to be sung; it’s another thing to try to work out the unfamiliar, unatttractive (to me) music in the A.D. 1984 “Book of Praise:  Anglo-Genevan Psalter.”  (Psalm 136 does go to the tune of “Jesus loves me.”  A few other tunes I like are close enough to be made to fit a few of the ’84 lyrics, but I never got far trying that Psalter.  “The Book of Psalms for Singing” works for me, tho 78A replaces several hard-to-stomach tunes.) /                                            … Read more »

Tom Brainerd
Guest

Now about that Goudimel…

RFB
Guest
RFB

I have a 1 ton 4wd truck with 20 foot gooseneck deckover trailer. I still cannot fit a tune on it and have it be there for delivery. The very best thing that has ever happened to me musically has been the Brother Down Old Paths, New Feet compilation. It has made a huge difference.

Douglas S
Guest
Douglas S

What if you are one of the musically gifted, understand the need for simplicity, and yet in spite of many hours of prayer and attempts to change your attitude, cannot worship to music at your average church because it is so poorly written or performed as to be a distraction?  All the good musicians in town are over at First Liberal Presbyterian.