And Lots Have

The more I read Wright interacting with Piper, the less I want to say “new perspective” and “old perspective,” and the more I want to say macro perspective and micro perspective. This is an unnecessary quarrel between the astronomer and the microbiologist. But, though it may be an unnecessary quarrel, it remains a necessary debate. …

Calvin Gets Down to Brass Tacks

Book 1/Chapter 16 The nature of providence (section 4) 1. What does the word providence not refer to? 2. Is providence limited to foreknowledge? 3. If God governs the laws of nature only, what has been taken from Him? God’s special providence (section 5) 1. If God controls the general laws only, what is no …

Calvin on Providence

Book 1/Chapter 15 Adam’s freedom (section 8) 1. Did Adam have the resources, prior to the Fall, to attain to eternal life? 2. Why should we not invoke the doctrine of secret predestination in this discussion? 3. Why do the “philosophers” misunderstand the nature of man? Book 1/Chapter 16 Creation and providence (section 1) 1. …

Just a Skosh More on Imputation

If we have courtroom imagery, and any kind of stand-in representative for the defendants, then there is no way for the thing to work without imputation. Wright confuses things enormously when he rejects the idea that righteousness can float across the courtroom from the judge to the defendant. Of course it cannot, and defenders of …