Blog & Mablog

Theology That Bites Back

  • Home
  • The Proprietor
  • Video Gallery
  • Speaking & Events
  • Books
    • eBooks
    • Books by Me
    • Books by Family
    • Book Log
  • Audio Sets
  • Controversy Library
  • App
  • Store
    • Store
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • All Products
You are here: Home / How God Hooked Us Up

How God Hooked Us Up

Thursday, May 2, 2013 By Douglas Wilson

So here below is a friendly rejoinder to a response to my recent jab at hermeneutical humility. My thanks to Micah Neely for the interaction. The nuances here may seem exquisite to some and very fine, but I actually think a great deal rides on it. It is le big deal, as the French put it so wonderfully.

My rejoinder has three points, making it, I suppose, a trijoinder.

First, if we think in terms of which hermeneutical approach makes truth “possible,” I think we have already lost the game. In order to function in robust scriptural categories, we need a hermeneutical approach that understands truth as inescapable.

We are not setting out with a hermeneutical flashlight, looking for a particular pebble of truth at the bottom of Carlsbad Caverns, but rather our problem is that we are running off to the basement with our hermeneutical flashlight in a vain attempt to get away from the sun. The earth is full of His glory (Is. 6:3). Day unto day pours forth speech, and the words go to the end of the world (Ps. 19:4). The invisible things of God are clearly seen, and have been since the creation (Rom. 1:20). So we need a hermeneutic capable of supporting the weight of inescapable, omnipresent, won’t-leave-us-alone truth, and not just possible truth. The hunt for truth is not looking for a needle in a haystack. It is more like looking for hay in a haystack.

But second, lest I be thought to be inveighing against humility, which would be bad, let me say I only have a beef with misplaced humility, and not with interpretive humility proper. True epistemic humility lets God tell us true things. Faux-humility wants to complicate it.

Not surprisingly, Chesterton makes this point wonderfully.

“Modesty has moved from the organ of ambition. Modesty has settled upon the organ of conviction where it was never meant to be. A man was meant to be doubtful about himself, but undoubting about the truth: this has been exactly reversed. Nowadays the part of a man that a man does assert is exactly the part he ought not to assert-himself. The part he doubts is exactly the part he ought not to doubt – the Divine Reason… The old humility was a spur that prevented a man from stopping: not a nail in his boot that prevented him from going on. For the old humility made a man doubtful about his efforts, which might make him work harder. But the new humility makes a man doubtful about his aims, which will make him stop working altogether.”

And last, I quite grant that if a modernist means by “objective” something raw and immediate, then he is talking through the back of his neck. But that is not what objective needs to mean.

Our knowledge is mediated to us by means of language, poems, metaphors, and (yes) propositions. But this is a design feature. It really is mediated to us — and this fact does not downgrade the quality of the knowledge gained. I gain objective knowledge when I receive objective knowledge by the means that God appointed to carry it to me.

Those means exclude me attaining to a God-like status that can know things “raw and uncooked.” But they include trusting that God hooked me up to the world the right way. He wanted me to know that my keyboard was right under my fingertips at this very moment, and He also plainly wanted me to know (objectively) that my keyboard is black. How do I know this? God told me. Look.

I give metaphor a very high place, but I also give it high praise. It actually communicates truth. It was designed to. So real humility steps out of the way and lets language do its God-appointed job. Metaphor, typology, figures, propositions, etc. do not blur. They tell. Just as copper conducts electricity, human language conducts truth.

Micah says this in his conclusion: “Giving up our ideas of objective certainty is not apostasy, it is the one thing necessary for us to return to true Trinitarian thought.” But the first thing I would want to know is whether or not I can have any objective certainty about whether I have arrived at true Trinitarian thought, or even if I have a duty to try.

If he only means to say that we have to give up our quest for autonomous certainty, then I am in the amen corner. But giving up objective certainty means that we are all still in our sins. If we give up objective certainty in order to return to the Trinity, my very first question will be what Trinity?

Related

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Goo-Mongers, Postmodernism

Submit A Letter to the Editor. Well-written, fair-minded letters may be interacted with in featured posts. Also, please mention the title of the post which you are addressing.

Theology That Bites Back

Search from Dan to Beersheba

SkyRocket

SkyrocketWP WordPress Maintenance, Hosting, and Support Service

About the Proprietor

Follow

Bookmarks

  • Ben Zornes
  • Calvinist International
  • Femina
  • Free From Bitterness
  • Having Two Legs
  • Mere Orthodoxy
  • Right Mind
  • The Westminster Standards
  • Warhorn Media

What’s Done Been Wrote

Tag Cloud

Adoration Apologetics in the Void Auburn Avenue Stuff Book Review Chrestomathy Church Government Church Year Confession for the Nations Creation and Food Culture and Politics Current Topics Devil in a Blue Dress Dualism Is Bad JuJu Education Exhortation Familial Getting By Goo-Mongers Grace and Peace Hamartiology Life in the Regeneration Liturgy and Worship Mere Christendom Moscow Diversity Cleansing N.T. Wrights and Wrongs Obama Nation Building On Scandal Parable Political Dualism Politics Postmodernism Practical Christian Living Psalms Puritan Poetics Second Battle of Tours Selected Quotes Sex and Culture Shameless Appeals Study Guide for the Institutes Taking a Stroll on the Links The Lord's Table Thinking Straight Topical Who Is Sufficient? Your Friday Funny

Category Count

Get the App


app by woväx

Search from Dan to Beersheba

Copyright © 2018 Blog & Mablog · Website by SEO Skyrocket