Juletters

Sharing Options
Show Outline with Links

Ratios of Gratitude

Re. A Little Preliminary Horsing Around
200 proof gratitude is more to the mark. 200 proof = 100%, though I’m likely not the first to say so.
Have a nice day!

Mr. Bugs

Mr. Bugs, you are the first to say so! But I am not sure that mere mortals could handle rubbing alcohol levels of gratitude.

You Could Say That

“When I am around 89 . . . I will be done holding back by that point.”
So . . . the November of your life will be no quarter November, eh?

Kyriosity

Kyriosity, well, more or less.

Nearby Gentle Parenting

I hope you are well. I could use some advice. I find myself constantly getting upset by my brother-in-law and his soft parenting approach on his kids. We’re both Christians but we don’t attend the same church. I notice the lack of corporal punishment on their kids just by how they behave in certain aspects. I don’t want my daughter thinking certain behaviors are okay. Also I don’t want to keep being upset by this. How should I respond when I see Christian parents not doing their duty? Especially when they’re family?
Grace and peace!

S

S, the first thing would be not to worry about your kids getting the wrong ideas. They can see the whole picture, just like you do. If necessary, as your kids grow older, you can talk with them about it. The second thing is to catch yourself by warning yourself to not object to his kids’ lack of self-control by exhibiting your own lack of self-control. Discipline yourself the way you wish his kids were being disciplined. And last, remember that God placed those kids in that family for a reason, and just pray for them.

A Tucker Question

I thank God for your gospel work in Christ.
I’m a student (at Hillsdale). I am a regular listener of your blog and Andrew Klavan’s weekly podcast. A couple years ago, for a period of six months or so, I was listening to Tucker Carlson regularly. I stopped, because I began to question whether he had a clear alternative proposed to the ideas/people he didn’t like.
I’m writing to ask where your criticisms of Tucker stem. I was talking with my brother recently and both of us are confused with the seemingly outsized criticisms of Tucker (we were discussing Klavan’s criticism). It seems strange that his name is joined to criticisms of Candace and Fuentes. I’d appreciate advice on how to think about Tucker. Just to reiterate, I haven’t tracked Tucker super closely recently, but I’ve listened to a few full episodes again more recently to try to understand why people I respect are critiquing him to a strong degree.
P.S. I just missed meeting you in Hillsdale. I had to go home to CT to play music for a wedding, and instead encouraged my history teacher from Italy to go. I believe you spoke to her for a while. I also just met your grandson Judah at a restaurant in D.C.

In Christ,
Paul

Paul, sorry to have missed you. And yes, I had a great conversation with your teacher. With regard to Tucker, I don’t put him in the same category with Candace or Fuentes at all. I do believe he is listening to the wrong people, particularly on Islam, and was thrust into a position of spiritual influence without an adequate biblical grounding for himself.

Christians Teaching in Public School

I have read a few of your books on Christian Education and profited much from them, thank you.
My question is, do you think it is sin for a Christian to be a teacher at a public school? The reason I ask is that I would like to be an educator and to that end may be attending university in the fall. All things being equal, I would rather teach at a Christian institution. The snag is that I owe my ex-wife alimony and child support based on a high income for my job as a functionary, and downgrading careers will not lower the amount owed her. As the Christian schools pay less than half of what the public schools pay, I do not believe it feasible to provide for myself on a Christian school salary and pay alimony and child support.
Also, there are few Christian schools, and no Classical Christian schools, in the Canadian Province where I reside, so job prospects for Christian teaching are not great.
Your insight is appreciated,

In a Tough Spot

IATS, no, I don’t think it is a sin for a Christian to teach in a public school, but I do believe it is an affliction. Students in public school are not in a position to know what is being done to them, while adults with a biblical worldview can protect themselves with good filters. The reason it is an affliction is that you are either going to make a real difference spiritually in the lives of the students, or you will not. If you do not, the futility of your work will get to you at some point. And if you do make a difference, you will find yourself escorted to the curb.

Sleep Training Babies

I have a question about parenting, specifically about sleep training (no, this is not with reference to any specific post on this blog). We have heard—and been encouraged—to consider either the cry-it-out or graduated cry-it-out methods to train our 4-month-old baby to sleep independently, especially at night. But, to us, everything about how the method works seems unnatural, even cruel. Do you have any wisdom to offer on this? Are we missing something?

Jiby

Jiby, my recollections of this particular issue are almost half a century old, so bear with me. With newborns, we got up and attended to them—fed them, changed them, etc. There was an issue to be attended to, in other words. But after a few months went by, we got into different territory, where there was no presenting issue other than that the child wanted to be fussy at 2 in the morning. When that happened, and they were clean, dry, and fed, it was time to tell them to count it all joy when you meet various trials.

Litmus Test

A good litmus test, I would think, for edgy sorts of right wingers would be whether they love (white) women (I do not mean they support feminism) or whether they are constantly mocking women, as Nick Fuentes is understood to do. If they clearly understand husbands are to be kind to their wives, and recognize that women are lovely and to be protected, and feel sorry for women who have been led astray by radicalism, they are probably authentic in what they think and concerned about real problems, even if they like some dubious or evil characters. If they hate women, particularly, in the case of right wingers, white women, they are either deranged or perhaps some kind of plant.

James

James, there is something in what you say.

Church Leadership

I have a question regarding elder meetings and leadership.
I am a pastor that is part of a more charismatic/baptist church. I serve as the “lead pastor” and have other pastors and elders that serve alongside me.
Over the years, the topic of whether or not it is appropriate to have a “lead pastor” has come up. The thought is that the “lead” guy seems to have more authority than the rest of the leaders. I understand that from a presbyterian or even baptist point of view, elder sessions may vote on large decisions which would be a kind “checks and balance” for a lead pastor. At our church, our elders have chosen to do everything by unanimous decision. Meaning if someone has a pause in their discernment or judgement about an impactful decision, the leadership team would wait until unity can be found. That elder often understands that eventually he has to willingly “submit” or move on from leadership so unity can be arrived at. I see this as similar to having a vote though less formal. The lead guy often does quite a bit of heaving lifting in driving the conversation and providing direction on where the session should go.
However, I know that if I make an overarching decision without any regard for my fellow elders, I have overstepped in my leadership.
As the “lead” guy, I don’t believe I have more authority than the other pastors/elders. I was placed in that role unanimously by the other leaders several years ago and have done my best to faithfully lead but also encourage the other elders/pastors beside me. If any of them have a concerns or thoughts about something, I and the others weigh them intently. But it is undeniable that I lead the staff and in many ways the church through teaching most regularly.
It seems to be that leadership structures that flatten all authority and remove someone from being the point man turns it into “too many cooks in the kitchen”. Maybe that’s not the appropriate saying. I hope you gather the essence of the question. I’ve read Strauch’s book on Biblical Eldership and find myself agreeing with many of the biblical principles he concludes. However, it seems to me that he suggests then that any sense of someone taking the “lead” role does injustice to the plurality.
When I consider the Bible, it seems to me that men like Peter and Paul were undeniably strong leaders. Their words carried immense weight yet they would still say they were “fellow elders”.
How do you see balancing a leadership where there is a “senior minister” or “lead pastor” and letting him lead but also ensuring that leadership is properly shared? How does he freely lead but not overstep? How is a church led by a plurality of a session yet still have a senior minister? Am I off on how I’m thinking about leadership?
Thanks for considering! Any recommended readings?
Cheers,

James

James, there are a lot of good principles in Strauch’s book, and we use it in our training. But he holds to a two-office view (deacons and elders) while we hold to a four-office view (ministers, teachers, ruling elders, and deacons). I don’t know if it is still in print, but try to get the book Order in the Offices, edited (I think) by Brown. The problem with the unanimity requirement is that you have in essence made the dissenting vote the lead. pastor on that issue. In our system, I as the lead pastor answer to the elders. I am on the session, and my vote is counted the same way as the others are, but is weighed differently.

Thanks for the Tip

I hope you’re doing well. This summer I went to Antigua for 10 days. We were afforded this opportunity from friends who pilot boats back-and-forth for the ship’s owners.
Since we knew, we were going to be away from home over the Lord’s day, we scheduled attending church in Antigua with Hensworth W.C. Jonas from East Caribbean Baptist Mission.
He is a very interesting man. He shared with us the struggles that men have there, and I was surprised to find out, he even conceal carries at church. It seems even paradise is messed up.
Homeschooling is illegal in Antigua, so he went and got his doctorate in education and opened a school. I just saw that one of the children who graduated became a senator on the island.
I don’t know if you know the man, but I’m sure he’s not hard to find. I think he would be a great guest on Man Rampant. He’s entertaining and I think would be interesting to viewers. I believe they have four or five churches, and the elders rotate around to the churches for live preaching every Sunday.
That’s all I have. I hope you have a great day.

Vernon

Vernon, thanks. He sounds like an interesting cat.

Thank Much

“Andrew Nelson Lytle . . . once that . . .” should be “once wrote that . . . “? (Or “said”?)
Just fix if worth that—no need for credit. (I tell my trainees at work, Don’t let MY obsessive-compulsive ruin YOUR day.”)

Andrew

Andrew, I fixed it. And you get all the credit.

Kids and the Government Schools

I know that you’ve covered the issue of Christian parents taking their kids out of the government school system (public schools). There has been quite a dust-up on X recently re: a post by Jen Wilkin. Apparently, she has stepped in it big-time. Here’s the offending “tweet” and comments.
Take care,

Matthew

Matthew, I should be able to vote in school board elections because my money goes there. And I can support the eventual replacement of government schools, as I do, and still have an opinion on the various outrages that are happening there. And I can support those parents who resist such outrages, while being aware of the inconsistencies in their opposition. For example, some parents are outraged to find the schools are teaching socialism, while my objection would be that the schools are socialism. But I still support such parents because the path to educational enlightenment can be a long and rocky one.

Where to Draw the Line?

Beyond the obvious judicial nonsense generated by Obergefell (and the legal and social taboos against the other obvious candidates), do you have any personal pastoral principles (or established church policies) regarding when to refuse to perform a marriage (or to permit use of church facilities to that end)?
In the messier realms in which many modern relationships function (e.g. pornography, cohabitation, divorce and remarriage), are there particular criteria you and Christ Church seek to have couples meet before/when beginning premarital counseling? Or would you direct towards any particular resources for discerning and developing such guidelines?

A Rural Rector

ARR, I would not officiate at any wedding that was an unlawful union (e.g. unbiblical divorce in the past, a believer marrying a non-believer, etc.). But a marriage can be unwise without being unlawful, and I would not automatically decline to officiate there—although I would decline if the lack of wisdom was egregious.

Permission Granted

During your post about AI, I really enjoyed one specific quote you said. I’m thinking about using that quote in a music project I plan on doing this week:
“The spirit of the prophet is subject to the prompts.”
Let me know if you don’t want me to.

Tim

Tim, be my guest, and thanks for checking.

The Voice of Moderation

I appreciate your work as a moderating force against dangerous and destabilizing extremism and perhaps I will even put in a good word on the reddits or some such in your direction. Respect. Believe it or not the Good Lord does at some times break through my shell of irony and doubt and shines brightly.

Ding Dong

DD, thank you for paying attention.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Areyou
Areyou
4 hours ago

Thank you for submitting a letter to Blog & Mablog. Years from now, after you have been nominated to become the next Secretary of State, the fact that you used to read this blog, and even were so far gone in your depravity that you wrote this letter to us, will no doubt be brought up at the congressional hearings. Such being the case, we commend you for your courage. At the same time, while admiring your bravery, we have to warn you that because of the volume of letters we receive, we are not able to promise to publish… Read more »

Jake
Jake
1 hour ago

I actually perused the Wong decision. Wong’s parents chose to return to China when Wong was a teenager. When he was of age, he returned and that is how the case got started. One of the men who were sent to Gitmo was one of those children fathered by an international student in Mississippi. he parlayed his citizenship for his release from Gitmo and his return to Saudi Arabia. There is a Chinese spy who is doing time who had been on birther tourism and his sibling hightailed it back to China.

Thomas Bauer
Thomas Bauer
40 minutes ago
Reply to  Jake

You might say the courts got it Wong.

E
E
32 minutes ago
Reply to  Jake

Anecdotes…not the general reality. It’s demonizing a whole group, immigrants, and is not Christ-like…unless you can show me how Jesus would have handled and thought of this…