Novembletters

Sharing Options
Show Outline with Links

An Aged Fruit Salad

Saying, “I believe in democracy” or “I believe in a multi-ethnic state”, etc. is the equivalent of saying, “I believe in love.” However, “love” is a noun of indistinct definition meaning something very different to a horny young man than to a young lady looking for a husband. “Democracy” has a distinct definition and exists whether I ‘believe’ in it or not. Would it not be better to state “I prefer a democracy over a republic”? OR “I prefer to not live in a society of people who look similar to me”? As the great Rush Limbaugh used to say, “words mean things.” Additionally, I’m so glad you have been trying to burn that couch for the last few years. My husband says it looks as if a fruit salad exploded over it . . .

Melody

Melody, thank your husband for bringing us back to the real issues.

CN & Puerto Rico?

In light of the framework described in said post, how should American CNs think about the relationship between the USA and Puerto Rico? How should Puertorican CNs think about it?

CS

CS, I don’t think Puerto Rico should be a state, but they have been a territory for a long time. I would be in favor of keeping the status quo, unless and until a referendum there indicated overwhelming support for leaving.

Idolatry & Isms

Your piece about democracy as a potential idol resonates with a talk that Jonathan Pageau gave at the recent ARC conference. I wonder if you saw it and would be willing to comment on it, particularly on the obvious imbalance between the overtly religious and the secular in this loose ad hoc organization that gathered together because they are seeing the need to resist Mr. Global whoever he is in the name of God. That’s more than I see any of our politicians doing. The thing of the elephant in the room is one you regularly are willing to say, but might you have something to say about our propensity not to notice elephants in the room. It seems there were more than just the one elephant in the ARC room which Jonathan chose to name.

Michelle

Michelle, sorry, I didn’t catch that talk, and so it would not be edifying to try to talk about it.

Thanks on the Jewish Thing

I just finished reading you article “A Round-Up On Race, Ethnicity, and Antisemitism” and I wanted to say thank you. Thank you for the clarity you wrote with on the topic.

This was a blessing to read. I’m a Christian of partly Jewish descent, and this has while matter of antisemitism, ethnicity, and the like has been lodged in my mind for a while. Especially recently, as you can imagine. It’s been a time of very acute temptation to fear and distrust the Lord.

But thank you for calling our brothers and sisters to a Pauline love for Jews. It was this love that I saw while reading Calvin’s chapters in the Institutes on Baptism and Circumcision, for instance, that encouraged me to give thanks for the Reformed fathers.

My heart breaks and sometimes I groan for the Jews who still abide in disbelief. And it grieves me to see godly Christian people condemn them and wish them cut off, and even gloat over them as if Paul never warned against these things.

Jacob

Jacob, thank you.

A Personal Question

I have seen you lend your wisdom to personal questions on here before, and I wonder if perhaps you have any advice for a painful family situation I am facing.

Some background: there was a lot of tension between my parents during my childhood. From as early as preschool age I have so many memories of my mom being very disrespectful to my dad. Of course, as a child, I had no words for this. As I grew older and began to zero in on what was wrong with my family, I could see faults on both sides, but my dad’s many attempts at affection and levity were almost always rebuffed with painful callousness from my mom. Tragically, my father took his life many years ago when I was a young adult. My mother expressed some level of regret at the way she had treated him, but she seemed to quickly assuage her conscience by saying, “Lots of men have a b—- for a wife and they don’t kill themselves.” I never wanted to add to her guilt or stand in judgment over her. I believe my dad has to answer for his own actions on Judgment Day. So I was content to be what comfort I could to my mother without speaking to her actions as a wife.

Now, there is a man in her life. I know intellectually that she is not bound and is free to have this relationship. I can honestly say that I am glad she is not lonely. However, hearing her speak so highly of this man and seeing her treat him with admiration and respect is breaking my heart all over again. I don’t want to hear about this relationship, be involved in it, or witness it. To see her respect this man when she refused to respect my father is unbearable to me. I am on the verge of tears even as I type this.

When I tried to address this with her, the response was, “Well, you never heard my side of the story, and there are things about your father I will never tell you.” No apology, no awareness that she was a foolish woman who tore her house down with her own hands. While she is a professing and practicing Christian, I don’t believe she is aware of 1 Peter 3, or that her rendering of respect was not meant to be contingent on her husband’s behavior. She was not interested in my suggestion that we seek pastoral counsel.

My husband (who knows I am writing to you) thinks that my feelings are understandable and that I am not in the wrong to have a boundary when it comes to this relationship. He encourages me to invite my mom over and have a relationship in other ways, and if she refuses to interact with us without this man then that is her choice. The problem is, she actually is refusing! She has turned down every dinner invitation, and her standing weekly invitation for us to have dinner with her has been rescinded because she now wants to include him and will not host us at her place without him there. I don’t know what to do. The stress has been manifesting in physical symptoms apart from tears of sadness.

In the last months of my father’s life, I approached him about my mom’s behavior (he was much more approachable than my mom) after reading Emmerson Eggerich’s book “Love and Respect,” which had really opened my eyes. Even in his pain, my dad was a father to me and told me that I am to honor my mother because God commands it. How do I honor her in this situation?

T

T, there are obviously many things about this whole situation that I don’t know, and so take this with a grain of salt. But there also appear to be some things that you might not know (your mom’s side of things), and there are some other things that you can see and do know. For example, the fact that your mom can be respectful of this other man at least means that your mom was reacting poorly to something in her relationship with your dad, which is more understandable than being generally disrespectful. You don’t want to be in the weird position of approving of another relationship, provided your mother is just as bad this time around. At the same time, it is not good to take hostages over dinner invitations either. I would encourage you to root out all the resentments in your life, mortify them, take your mom to lunch, and tell her you would like to give it a try. When you get home, talk to your husband and ask him to intervene if things spiral in a bad direction. Let him be the bad guy.

A Recent Resource

Are there resources you would recommend for counseling for a miscarriage? Lord willing, I never have to use it, but I want to receive wisdom on this subject and be prepared.

Thanks

Stephen

Stephen, yes. I just became aware of this resource.

If the Shoe Fits

Re: The Little Drummer Boy Responds . . . You talk about folks “feeling judged” when you satirize a certain TYPE of person, and about their reaction “if the shoe fits”. . . Well . . . If some of your critics are among those who’s staid decorum is what got us evangelicals into this current mess in the first place . . . Perhaps the shoe fits . . .

Michael

Michael, perhaps it does . . .

Maybe Not in the Vocative

Based on 1 Peter 3:6, do you believe that women should literally call their husbands “lord” today? How would you respond to an egalitarian who says that Peter mentions Sarah obeying Abraham and calling him “lord” together, so that if women do not literally have to call their husbands “lord,” the command to obey their husbands must not apply any more either? You have argued that a woman’s marriage vows should include the word “obey” (as they traditionally have), and this would seem to be the clearest text to support that. While I would tend to think that “submit” (which wives are commanded to do to their husbands in a number of other verses) would include obeying, some egalitarians have argued that “submit” and “obey” are completely different and that there is no command for wives to obey their husbands.

Will

Will, Sarah doesn’t call Abraham lord directly, in the vocative, but she does refer to him as her lord. And I believe that Christian women today should think of their husbands that way, and should be willing to refer to them that way if the occasion demands. And in Titus 2:9, slaves are told to be obedient to their masters, and the word used is hupotasso. The same word is used of wives in v. 5.

Gainful Employment

Thank you for writing Rules for Reformers. I don’t have a reference copy on hand, but I do have a situation that needs your wisdom.

For context, I’m a hospital worker in Humboldt County, which is in a rural and very blue corner of California. HR wanted everyone to get both COVID and influenza shots, but I declined both. I hoped the pressure would lessen somewhat. Then, my boss forwarded an order from the county Health Officer mandating that all hospital caregivers who decline the COVID & flu vaccine “wear a mask in patient care areas during the influenza season.” This “influenza season” begins November 1 and supposedly ends April 30. They sent this on Oct. 30, giving under two days’ notice.

This is clearly segregation on a 21st century level, and I’ve already made up my mind to not comply. I am preparing to just quit and find another job (there’s nothing much at stake in my situation).

But if I were to escalate this, where should a 19-year-old receptionist start? Should I start by whistleblowing on social media, contacting a good law office, or confronting the health officer herself? Is it even worth the fight?

Thank you for all your help. Keep up the good work in Moscow.

Joan

Joan, the issue is worth the fight, but one of the things you need to do is count the resources you have available for such a fight. And it doesn’t sound like you have many, so I would just move on.

Thanksgiving Materials?

No post in particular, just regarding the current season. Pastor Doug – do you have any recommendations for books or resources for kiddos to teach them about Thanksgiving? I’m talking about little ones under 5. Some of the resources I’ve come across, even for that age, have a woke bent that I’d like to avoid.

Brandon

Brandon, no, I don’t, but let’s crowd source this one? Anyone have any hot tips on Thanksgiving materials for teahing littles?

Evangelism Now

I would like to hear your thoughts about the “Great Commission.” If in the Apostles’ view the nations were reached (1 Thessalonians 1:8, for example) and if we understand the “age” that was ending as the “Jewish” age how should we justify our efforts to reach the World for Christ in this present time? Are the “nations” in Matthew 28:19 the same that were reached in the 1st century (Colossians 1:23), or are they the parts of the “unreached world” right now?

Is the “age” in Matthew 28:20, that “Jewish” age that ended in 70 AD or this present age that will end with the 2nd coming of Jesus?

Gustavo

Gustavo, in the first century, the gospel was proclaimed to the inhabited world (Roman Empire), but the Great Commission has the actual discipling of the ethnoi in view, a process that takes longer. So I take the Great Commission as entailing both that age and the age to come.

Ariel the Baptist?

In response to the recent NQN trailer: There’s a curious rumor going around that you torched Ariel in the NQN trailer as a declaration of war against Baptists, as she was clearly fully immersed, and possibly even 1689. Can you confirm or deny this? Curious minds want to know.

Gregory Gilbert Gelderson, or G3 for short

G3, actually she was there as a representative of Pharaoh’s hosts, who were also fully immersed.

But seriously, folks . . . the Disney princesses were there because of they represent the face of the “follow your heart” heresy.

A Bit More on Jews

A bit more about Jew-envy. One thing I have noticed about a certain kind of Christian is a begrudging of modern unconverted Jews their ancestral connection to true religion as though the Torah is in no sense Jewish. It is, in fact, read aloud in Jewish congregational gatherings and it is studied diligently by modern Jewish scholars. What’s more, there are orthodox Christian pastors who consult Jewish commentary to better understand the Torah.

This is so crass. A Christian who is a physical descendant of King David does not have a different or better spiritual ancestry than I do. We are both true branches. The most he can claim is that some of his ancestors got there before some of mine—but how does that diminish me as a son of God?

It smells like envy to me, but it’s so petty as to be grotesque. Why envy unconverted Jews their blood heritage when it does them little good without the spiritual heritage, which every Gentile believer has in full?

Daniel

Daniel, thanks. But if envy made any sense, it wouldn’t be sin.

An NQN Proposal

First, thank you so much for the daily strengthening and encouragement you bring to your content, especially during NQN. “Fell deeds awake, fire and slaughter!” just about sums it up, and I’m here for it!

Second, my family is crazy about your description of the “stylistic differences” between postmill and premill brothers. We were going to have a T-shirt printed for one of my brothers with “I don’t think so, Scooter!” captioning an appropriate picture, but we didn’t want to steal any of your intellectual property. Could we suggest, in honor of NQN, that Blog and Mablog release a shirt involving that quote? We were thinking, for the picture, something along the lines of a Dore engraving of an Old Testament prophet, or possibly Gideon cutting down the groves of Baal—but we don’t want to be pushy. We will be your first customers if such a thing ever came on the market!

Thank you!

Hannah

Hannah, great idea. Let’s hope, you and I, that someone at Canon picks it up. In the meantime, permission granted for any of you all to run with it.

Another Question to Crowd Source

Good stuff as always, thank you.

I would really love to see a scene-by-scene break down of Jordan Peterson’s freshly released “Post Modernist Drinking Song”—many of his references are too obscure for me, one who has never read deeply or studied philosophy, but I imagine that Doug could really take us all to school on this one, and it wold be for the better I suppose. Grace and Thanks.

Daniel

Daniel, okay, I will think about it. But someone will have to help me out first. Where could I find this Post Modernist Drinking Song?

Liberty Catechism

I’m working through your Liberty Catechism adding proof texts as we discuss it in the government class I teach. I’m coming up on question 23, in which you wrote, “to prevent a helter-skelter approach to the making of laws, the legislative body should be divided into two houses, to make the process of legislation more deliberative.” In reading this, I’m reminded of the federalist/anti-federalist debate over our bicameral legislature. The federalists wanted it to put a check on democracy (as you put it, make the process more deliberative), which included making the Senate more accountable to the state legislatures, while the anti-federalists thought two houses would make Congress less accountable to the people. Both deliberation and accountability to the people have biblical support, but I’m having a hard time coming up with proof texts for a bicameral legislature, e.g., passages that might place a stronger emphasis on deliberation or avoiding a helter-skelter approach rather than on accountability or responsiveness to the people; especially given that Senate accountability to the states was removed by the 17th Amendment. Thoughts?

Bill

Bill, yes. I don’t think it is primarily a matter of deliberative v. accountable. I believe that a Senate comprised of men appointed by state legislature makes the system more genuinely federal. It is not so much a matter of how everyone behaves at the table, and more a question of who gets to come to the table.

Hope You Enjoyed It

It’s 3 am EST and I’m sitting here excited for the very first NQN of the month! All I have to say is thanks for using your gifts in this way. God bless.

Tony

Tony, thanks. Hope the pay off was worth the wait.

Theonomy and 9marks

I’m in a training program for ministry at a Baptist Church and they recently found out I hold to theonomy and they are less than ok with it. So much so that they had a last minute meeting with me and were emphatic that being a Baptist and a theonomist was inconsistent which I don’t believe to be the case

They gave me 9marks “Church Matters: A New Christian Authoritarianism” and a podcast episode to listen too and I’ve read the book and listed to the episode and am wholly unconvinced of the critiques offered, though I don’t think I could address every argument thoroughly

I was wondering if you had resources I could read that address 9marks and I was wondering if you or someone else planned to refute 9marks

I also learned that they hold to progressive covenantalism and was curious for resources on that as well

Thank you for your ministry. My young family and I are routinely blessed by you and everyone else in Moscow

Matt

Matt, sorry, I don’t know of any specific rebuttals to the 9marks critique. Anyone out there know of anything?

Pleased to Meet You

I’m a servant to Jesus Christ, husband to my wife of 21 years, father to 3 boys 18, 14, 4. I’m a Captain on sport fishing boat in Destin Florida. I wanted to take a minute and write to you to thank you and maybe encourage you a little. I am thankful to have found your content on youtube a few years ago, and your messages, your preaching, your humor, your wit, frequent sarcasm, immediately resonated with me. It just clicked, I find myself laughing out loud and agreeing out loud to the screen when your doing Blog and Mablog, I have never been much of a book reader, I can listen like a champ though, lol. God has given me a blessing in my job most days I have many hrs where I’m working alone cleaning or fixing stuff on the boat, plus a one hour commute each way each day, plus many hours at the helm on fishing trips traveling sometimes 200 plus miles offshore, so I get to “listen” a lot to my ear buds. The Canon app is a treasure trove for me. I gave my life to the Lord in 4th grade I am 43 now, and was raised in a Christian household bounced between Baptist and Presbyterian. Like many I believed what I was taught not what I read on the “end times” that we would be raptured up any time and we should make sure “our house is in order. “ True, but this never made much sense to me when trying to explain to a friend, especially after reading the Bible more, starting in old test.

I was never aware of a “postmil “ view but when I did, first from some Jeff Durbin’s videos , then yours, then I kept digging from there, it just “clicked “ much more of the Bible makes sense now, I can explain the gospel with more confidence and clarity, live with more confidence, everything that Christ did for us means more, all the metaphors make sense. To me it’s a “BIG PICTURE “ view, it’s God sent his Son to die for a bigger reason, a Bigger reason than I once believed, the Grace is bigger, the Love is bigger, the resurrection is bigger, everything is. So thank you for doing what you do, thank you for being obedient, and faithfully diligent, I’m so glad God gave you the gifts you have, and the platform to use them. Not just the great articulation of your Postmil views but for your views on being a good father, good husband, and steadfast Christian Man. I’m so thankful for you and your ministry it has blessed me and my family, and I know so many others. Keep up the good work.

Sorry for the long blabbering, writing isn’t my strong suit. If you ever get to the Florida Panhandle, look me up.

Jeremy

Jeremy, thanks for the kind words, and God bless.

Seasoned With Salt

To your rejoinder to Denny Burk I say “Bravo!” I have never once thought of your loquacious and magniloquent language to be problematic. You emulate Chesterton well and illustrate the epitome of a “happy warrior.” I have a much harder time with other Christian “leaders” who refrain from satire, sarcasm, and the occasional biting word but have no problem with being outright mean in their mockery.

I will take your approach over their mockery any day. Like you said – not everyone is gifted in this area.

Jeff

Jeff, thanks very much.

A Good Idea

I have given out dozens of copies of Reforming Marriage over the years and continue to use it for pre-marital counseling.

Has anyone created a convenient study guide to lead couples through a counseling session (assuming, of course, that they read the material in advance)?

Christian

Christian, we have talked about it often, but it has never come together. I sent your note to Canon, to serve as another nudge.

The Architecture!

My homeschooling family and I have been touring the great Roman Catholic and Orthodox cathedrals of Europe and have been inspired by the glory of the architecture, created by men on a mission to glorify God according to their understanding. As we then entered a rather dull brick building on Sunday morning in England for a visit to a rather dull service in a local evangelical church, I find myself considering my own beliefs with regard to extravagant temple buildings, ecclesial ritual, and “high church.”

Have we Protestants perhaps gone too far in our intense focus on the bare preaching of the word as compared to physical expressions of beauty and temple? Have we some lessons to learn from the enduring attraction of the buildings and ceremony of our RC and Orthodox friends?

Joshua

Joshua, yes, there is a balance to be had. But there is one advantage to the plain style of architecture. With the glorious buildings, when the Spirit departs, it takes five hundred years for people to notice. When the Spirit departs from a duddy little chapel, everyone knows in about fifteen minutes.

A Last Note on the Little Drummer Boy

Re: The Little Drummer Boy Responds to Denny Burk

While the women were on the way to deliver the message to the 11 of what they had seen and what the angel told them, a group was working to call it a lie, using money (Matt 28:13-15). Upon telling the 11, the resurrection was taken as an idle tale (Luke 24:11)

The Greeks later held it was impossible (Acts 26:8) and mocked those who proclaimed this message (Acts 17:32)

The disciples who obeyed the Lord by waiting in Jerusalem for the Spirit of Truth were accused of being drunk (Acts 2:13)

Team reigning religion arrested those who believed (Acts 4:2-3) while one of them met the one he persecuted and ended up writing a lot of books in the word of God. He was also accused of introducing new gods (Acts 17:18-20)

Later he received unwelcome commandments from soothsayers (Acts 16: 16-18)

David the man after God’s own heart was for a time the preferred object lesson of mothers to their sons, relegating the town drunk to a higher status

Even the son of the one who merely defends the one who believes is subject to attempted murder by the father (1 Samuel 20:26:33).

The heart is desperately wicked and deceitful above all things, who can know it?

As the weeping prophet said

And you, sir, continue to receive the same by today’s 11 (or 10, maybe 9 as Peter and John had a foot race) and Greeks.

Well done and keep it up

Murk

Murk, thanks much.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
33 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Christopher
Christopher
1 year ago

Joan,

Not sure how it works in a hospital but your healthcare choices should be confidential. Not sure how anyone would know you should be wearing a mask if you choose not to.

Andrew Trauger
Andrew Trauger
1 year ago
Reply to  Christopher

Because it’s about science, health, care, flattening the curve, halting the spread, love, being good neighbors–it has never been about those things. It has always been about power for the elites and control over the masses. You have a right to privacy, a right to choose, a right to your own body, a right to keep you health matters secret, a right to free speech, a right to practice your religion–and some of those rights are actually guaranteed in the Constitution–but all of them are made void when ProgLib Marxist Elites say so. It really is that simple.

jimmy
jimmy
1 year ago
Reply to  Andrew Trauger

typhoid Mary is turning in her grave right now

Will
Will
1 year ago
Reply to  Andrew Trauger

You don’t have a right to employment, however.

Cherrera
Cherrera
1 year ago
Reply to  Will

If you have multiple minority status (e.g., black female lesbian) in most any gov’t or larger woke corporation, you pretty much do. Ever try to fire someone like that?

Jane
Jane
1 year ago
Reply to  Will

Legally speaking, you cannot be denied employment or terminated over medical issues that do not materially interfere with the performance of your job duties.

Justin Parris
Justin Parris
1 year ago
Reply to  Jane

Which is a really terrible idea for a law. For one, unless you’re contracted, your job duties are alterable, rendering the protection meaningless. They can just add job duties that are effected by the illnesses, wait for it to damage performance, and then fire you. For another, interfere by whose standard? Of course ultimately the judge, but this is a recipe for injustice. Its your money. You can’t decide what constitutes interfering with the product you are paying for? Imagine applying this standard to other goods or services. Your barber (or hair stylist) has an illness, and you’re not comfortable… Read more »

Jane
Jane
1 year ago
Reply to  Justin Parris

I agree that the law has its problems. I’m merely pointing out that it exists, so it’s not as simple as “you don’t have a right to employment.”

Will
Will
1 year ago
Reply to  Jane

I’m guessing the hospital would argue that refusing to be vaccinated and then refusing to accept reasonable accommodations (wearing a mask) would qualify as materially interfering with the performance of this employee’s duties.

Jane
Jane
1 year ago
Reply to  Will

Which, given the scientific evidence, is nonsense. You can’t just claim something is a necessity. It has to actually be one.

Last edited 1 year ago by Jane
Will
Will
1 year ago
Reply to  Jane

Jane, I have no idea what you’re quibbling about. In a legal dispute, the hospital will not have any problem adducing empirical studies and meta-analyses to support its policy that unvaccinated hospital workers wear masks. I also venture to guess that most courts in the United States would not agree with your assessment that these arguments are all nonsense. Generally speaking, employers possess a great deal of latitude in setting and enforcing health and safety requirements for their employees. Joan is well-advised not to pursue legal recourse: practically speaking, there is no legally enforceable right to employment in her case.… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Will
Cherrera
Cherrera
1 year ago
Reply to  Will

So cherry-picked studies and a corrupt judiciary mean no job for you! What a country!

Jane
Jane
1 year ago
Reply to  Will

I’m not saying her case is a strong one or that she’d be well-served to legally context the situation. I’m saying “there is no natural right to employment” is true, but that has to be weighed against the legal environment that actually exists. It’s true that in this case, the outcome is the same: because of the bad relationship between science and public policy around this issue, the fact that there are government created rights to employment that don’t exist naturally comes out the same as the lack of a natural right to employment — Joan will be pushed out… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Jane
Heather
Heather
1 year ago

https://www.amazon.com/Squanto-Miracle-Thanksgiving-Eric-Metaxas/dp/1400320399/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=302BCZV44GBZE&keywords=eric+metaxas+squanto&qid=1699375639&sprefix=eric+mataxas+sq%2Caps%2C140&sr=8-1 For a Thanksgiving book for littles, we’ve enjoyed this one. There’s one line that says “we’re all God’s children” – we just say, “discernment time! We’re not all his children, only his sheep are. But we’re all image bearers.”

John Middleton
John Middleton
1 year ago

T’s mom, or any other woman, can be respectful toward any man if she feels like it. A woman must respect her husband, period full stop. That T’s mom did not indicates fundamental unwillingness to respect, yes, was the issue, whatever else was going on. Since it’s November I’ll leave it at that.

Justin Parris
Justin Parris
1 year ago

Doug, Just watched your piece responding to Owen Strachan. I think what we’re dealing with here is a similar problem as faced by Catholicism but created from the opposite end. Catholicism has a complete authoritarian hold on who can become a teacher, and what precisely they must affirm and understand in order to become so. The problem with that authoritarian hold is as soon as you have a lousy person holding the authority, they start enforcing lousy results. From the Protestant perspective, we’ve done away with the authority, but as a consequence, there’s no reigns on the horse. The measure… Read more »

Jennifer Mugrage
1 year ago

Brandon, we used to have this wonderful book called If You Sailed on the Mayflower. Aimed at elementary school kids, but had good illustrations and the text could be adapted for littles.

I also suggest you find a print of a good painting of the occasion and just let them look at it and ask questions.

M
M
1 year ago

Hi Brandon,

Greetings! I remember “The Thanksgiving Story” by Alice Dagliesh to be mostly good – a little bit of relativism at the end (natives gave thanks to their “God”), which we just edit out when reading aloud.

Andrew Lohr
1 year ago

Destin? Just in case you care and don’t know, there are CREC churches in Valparaiso and Pensacola.

Joe
Joe
1 year ago

Ariel as a symbol of immersion Baptists !! Hahaha! Oh my! I hope that was a joke not a real question!

Reminds me of a woman wearing pearls who left very offended because casting pearls before swine was in the Sunday message. It was obvious to her that was a potshot from the pulpit.

Chaplain B. Josiah Alldredge
Chaplain B. Josiah Alldredge
1 year ago

Jeremy, there are other fans in the Florida Panhandle, and I am one of them. I live in Niceville, and attend a sister CREC church, Trinity Presbyterian Church in Valparaiso. We should connect sometime.

Barnabas
Barnabas
1 year ago

Just a reminder that the “good guys”, our greatest ally, ran an underaged global sex ring through Jeffrey Epstein for years to blackmail American politicians and business leaders.

Justin Parris
Justin Parris
1 year ago
Reply to  Barnabas

I’m working, but can’t come up with a single way in which this is relevant to any topic. Did someone write a letter about Epstein that I missed?

Cherrera
Cherrera
1 year ago
Reply to  Justin Parris

I guess it’s tangentially related to Jewish people mentioned in a letter and some recent discussions. I agree about Israel being a highly questionable ally considering the USS Liberty incident, the “Dancing Israelis” of 9/11 and other documented spies, Epstein’s Mossad connections, etc. But yeah, it’s kind of a random comment.

Justin Parris
Justin Parris
1 year ago
Reply to  Cherrera

The only way I can figure, is “We shouldn’t support Israel because they aren’t super good guys”.

The problem is that isn’t the reason anyone is suggesting you support Israel. Its being suggested because they are correct about this particular conflict. Its purely ad hominem reasoning. In this case, its ad hominem reasoning so wildly out of the blue as to look suspicious, like an old uncle at the dinner table who interrupts the conversation about football to rant about the chinamen.

Laurel
Laurel
1 year ago

Matt Re: Progressive Covenentalism
Check out https://christoverall.com/
That is their basic premise
AND they are discussing Christian Nationalism this month with a number of different men with differing opinions being interviewed, including Doug.
It seems to me more than Doug’s interview covers theonomy for at least a few minutes, and some of those men may be Baptist. Might be a place to start.
Also try founders.org and search “theonomy”. I got a few hits that look interesting.

Tom Paris
Tom Paris
1 year ago

re: Baptists and Theonomy
I’ve seen Jeff Durbin defend the consistency of theonomy with Baptist theology. I recommend checking him out.

Sam
Sam
1 year ago
Jonathan VS
Jonathan VS
1 year ago

Toward Hannah’s goal of a tee shirt, I offer this graphic á la DALL-E, though it is missing the caption… Perhaps I will add one later

signal-2023-11-09-19-26-46-579.jpg
Last edited 1 year ago by Jonathan Van Schenck
Rudolf Byker
Rudolf Byker
1 year ago

The Postmodern Drinking Song is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQTDEnfW4ng . But please skip or mute from 27s to 30s if and when you watch it and/or do a review. We would all do well to heed the warnings of the Heidelberg Catechism Q&A 99 “…nor share in such horrible sins by being silent bystanders”.

GRLT
GRLT
1 year ago

Joan, don’t quit- call their bluff. The same exact thing happened to my (Paramedic) husband. He even got sent home for not masking, but when he did not back down, they were unwilling to fire him. If they do follow through with firing you, you don’t want to work there anyway.
Worth noting – my husband was one of only two employees who refused the jab. Several years into the thing, he is one of the only employees who has not called in sick with the thing. Yay Science!!

Bruce Axtens
Bruce Axtens
11 months ago

Re: “I don’t think so, Scooter!” it could be a speech bubble out of the mouth of the angel in, as suggested, Dore particularly https://www.mediastorehouse.com.au/heritage-images/archangel-gabriel-instrument-god-14847018.html

Bruce Axtens
Bruce Axtens
11 months ago

Just cooked this up on Bing. Hope that helps, Hannah

_66d12421-e208-4456-a971-41fa16fc30f4.jpg