“The generality of men thought they did God good service in persecuting those who would not yield to the judgment of others who had a reputation for learning and piety. Those who were conscientious could not yield to their determinations, not seeing the truth of God in them, and this made the stir. While men appear obstinate by the rule of Christ, we are not to bear with them. This principle [that it is obstinacy not to be convinced by the judgment of many who are more learned and more godly] sets thousands of godly, peaceable men in the seat of the obstinate; these cannot in conscience yield, and others cannot but in conscience oppose them. What reconciliation then can be hoped for” (Burroughs, Irenicum, p. 127).
Search From Dan to Beersheba
Most Read Posts
- Fatherless Under the Fig Tree
- Doug Phillips' Resignation from Vision Forum
- Patriarchy, Vision Forum, and All the Rest of It
- A Drunk Trying to Make the Next Lamp Post
- Excesses of the Wahoo Brethren
- Like Watching a Hummingbird Fly
- Rabbits Should Know What Hawks Look Like
- Home Made Porn
- Sincere Public Apologies
- Empty Pulpits or Full Churches?
For the Illage Vidiots
Oh, Yeah, Sez You . . .
What’s Done Been Wrote
Adoration Apologetics in the Void A Second Battle of Tours Auburn Avenue Stuff Chrestomathy Church Government Church Year Confession for the Nations Creation and Food Culture and Politics Current Events Current Topics Devil in a Blue Dress Dualism Is Bad JuJu Exhortation Familial General Ruminations Getting By With a Little Help for My Friends Goo-Mongers Grace and Peace Hamartiology Life in the Regeneration Liturgy and Worship Mere Christendom Moscow Diversity Cleansing N.T. Wrights and Wrongs Obama Nation Building Old Table Talk Articles On Scandal Parable Political Dualism Politics Postmodernism Practical Christian Living Psalms Puritan Poetics Romans Selected Quotes Sex and Culture Shameless Appeals Study Guide for the Institutes Taking a Stroll on the Links The Lord's Table Thinking Straight Who Is Sufficient?