Pharisaical Caricature

I am currently reading a fine book on the Pharisees. The author, Tom Hovestol, is doing a really good job describing the Pharisees as they actually were, where they came from, what their goals were, and how much they resemble modern evangelicals. Although the book is coming from an unexpected quarter (Moody Press), it is …

Receiving and Retaining

In his article on justification in the New Dictionary of Theology, N.T. Wright says a number of good and indisputable things. The dictionary was edited by David Wright, J.I. Packer, and Sinclair Ferguson, so we know that the Reformed bona fides should be in good order here. And I thought the article was quite good, …

We Can’t Count That High

We will continue this thread under the heading N.T. Wrights and Wrongs even though we are officially off the trail and thrashing around in the bracken. I appreciated all the questions and comments. We are so naturally oriented to “works” that when we discover that an embryo can be saved apart from any works of …

Cooks Who Feed Only Themselves

The problem with asking questions about the “minimum amount” of orthodoxy it takes to get somebody into heaven is that it treats human beings like machines, and ultimately, it tends to reduce salvation to a matter of works. God saves us by His grace, on the basis of the death and resurrection of Jesus, and …

My Answer Is Right, Darn It

One of N.T. Wright’s more important points is the one he has adapted from the teaching of the great Elizabethan Anglican, Richard Hooker. This is the observation that justification by faith is not accomplished by affirming or believing in justification by faith. Believing the doctrine of justification by faith alone as a way of being …